An ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study of the comparative anti hypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and valsartan

被引:50
|
作者
Mancia, G
Korlipara, K
van Rossum, P
Villa, G
Silvert, B
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Osped S Gerardo, Dept Med, I-20052 Monza, Italy
[2] Pike View Med Ctr, Bolton, England
[3] Beatrix Ziekenhuis, Gorinchem, Netherlands
[4] Fdn S Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
[5] Stonehill Med Ctr, Bolton, England
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; angiotensin II receptor antagonists; irbesartan; valsartan;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200204000-00008
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background The primary objective of this study was to compare the change from baseline in mean diastolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) at 24 h post dose (trough measurement) after 8 weeks of treatment with irbesartan or valsartan in subjects with mild-to-mode rate hypertension. Secondary objectives included comparing the mean changes from baseline in systolic ABP at trough; 24-h ABP; morning and night-time ABP; self-measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); and office-measured SBP and DBP at trough. Design After a 3-week, single blind, placebo lead-in period, 426 subjects were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg or valsartan 80 mg for 8 weeks. Methods Ambulatory blood pressure measurements were obtained at baseline and at week 8. Self-measured morning and evening DBP and SBP readings were obtained at home over a 7-day period at baseline and at week 8. Office-measured seated DBP and SBP measurements were obtained at trough, at baseline, and at week 8. Results Irbesartan demonstrated significantly greater reductions than valsartan for mean change from baseline in diastolic ABP at trough (-6.73 versus -4.84 mmHg, respectively; P=0.035). Irbesartan produced significantly greater reductions than valsartan for mean systolic ABP at trough (-11.62 versus -7.5 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and for mean 24-h diastolic ABP (-6.38 versus -4.82 mmHg, respectively; P=0.023) and systolic ABP (-10.24 versus -7.76 mmHg; P < 0.01). Irbesartan also produced significantly greater reductions than valsartan for office-measured seated DBP (-10.46 versus 7.28 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and SBP (-16.23 versus -9.96 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and for self-measured morning DBP (-6.28 versus -3.75 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and SBP (-10.21 versus -6.97 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01). Both drugs were well tolerated. Conclusion Irbesartan was more effective than valsartan in reducing DBP and SBP at trough and in providing greater overall 24-h blood pressure-lowering efficacy. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to compare antihypertensive efficacy and safety of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, losartan and valsartan
    Monterroso, VH
    Chavez, VR
    Carbajal, ET
    Vogel, DR
    Martinez, GJA
    Garcia, LH
    Cuevas, JHB
    Teran, JL
    Hitzenberger, G
    Neves, PL
    Middlemost, SJ
    Dumortier, T
    Bunt, AMG
    Smith, RD
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2000, 17 (02) : 117 - 131
  • [2] Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to compare antihypertensive efficacy and safety of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, losartan and valsartan
    Victor H. Monterroso
    Victor Rodriguez Chavez
    Evert T. Carbajal
    Daniel R. Vogel
    Gustavo J. Aroca Martinez
    Luis H. Garcia
    Jorge H. B. Cuevas
    Joffre LaraTeran
    Gerhart Hitzenberger
    Pedro Leao Neves
    Shirley J. Middlemost
    Thomas Dumortier
    Antonius M. G. Bunt
    Ronald D. Smith
    Advances in Therapy, 2000, 17 : 117 - 131
  • [3] Comparative efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and losartan, in mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Kassler-Taub, K
    Littlejohn, T
    Elliott, W
    Ruddy, T
    Adler, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 11 (04) : 445 - 453
  • [4] Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    Sica, Domenic
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Handley, Alison
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (07) : 467 - 472
  • [5] Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: A comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan
    Smith D.H.G.
    Dubiel R.
    Jones M.
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2005, 5 (1) : 41 - 50
  • [6] Antihypertensive activity of angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists:: a systematic review of studies with 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Fabia, Maria Jose
    Abdilla, Noelia
    Oltra, Rosa
    Fernandez, Conrado
    Redon, Josep
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 (07) : 1327 - 1336
  • [7] Comparative Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide and Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination in Lowering Blood Pressure: A Retrospective Observational Study in Oman
    Al Balushi, K. A.
    Habib, J. Q.
    Al-Zakwani, I.
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2013, 22 (03) : 265 - 269
  • [8] A home blood pressure monitoring study comparing the antihypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonist fixed combinations
    Bobrie, G
    Delonca, L
    Moulin, C
    Giacomino, A
    Postel-Vinay, N
    Asmar, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (11) : 1482 - 1488
  • [9] Comparative efficacy of valsartan and olmesartan in mild-to-moderate hypertension: Results of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Maurizio Destro
    Rossana Scabrosetti
    Alessandro Vanasia
    Amedeo Mugellini
    Advances in Therapy, 2005, 22 : 32 - 43
  • [10] Comparative efficacy of losartan and valsartan in mild-to-moderate hypertension: Results of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Fogari, R
    Zoppi, A
    Mugellini, A
    Preti, P
    Banderali, A
    Pesce, RM
    Vanasia, A
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1999, 60 (04): : 195 - 206