Use of Topical Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:15
|
作者
Mallepally, Abhinandan Reddy [1 ]
Mahajan, Rajat [1 ]
Rustagi, Tarush [1 ]
Goel, Shakti Amar [1 ]
Das, Kalidutta [1 ]
Chhabra, Harvinder Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Spinal Injuries Ctr, Dept Spine Serv, New Delhi, India
关键词
Spine surgery; Topical; Tranexamic acid; Surgical blood loss; Cost-effectiveness; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP; TRANSFUSION RATES; SPINE SURGERY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2019.0134
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Nonrandomized, prospective, and case-controlled study. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of topically applied tranexamic acid (TXA) during different phases of spine surgery. Overview of Literature: Perioperative blood loss is the leading cause of postoperative anemia associated with prolonged stays in hospital and long recovery times. The direct and indirect costs involved pose a significant economic challenge in developing countries. There is no consensus for topical use of tranexamic acid in spine surgery. Methods: Patients requiring a single-level TLIF were divided into two groups. In the TXA group (n=75), the wound surface was soaked with TXA (1 g in 100 mL saline solution) for 3 minutes after exposure, after decompression, and before wound closure, and in the control group (n=175) using only saline. Intraoperative blood loss drain volume was recorded on each of the first 2 days immediately after surgery. An estimated cost analysis was made on the basis of the length of hospital stay and the blood transfusion. Results: IBL for the control group was 783.33 +/- 332.71 mL and for intervention group 410.57 +/- 189.72 mL (p <0.001). The operative time for control group was 3.24 +/- 0.38 hours and for intervention group 2.99 +/- 0.79 hours (p <0.695). Hemovac drainage on days 1 and 2 for control group was 167.10 +/- 53.83 mL and 99.33 +/- 37.5 mL, respectively, and for intervention group 107.03 +/- 44.37 mL and 53.38 +/- 21.99 mL, respectively (p <0.001). The length of stay was significantly shorter in the intervention group (4.8 +/- 1.1 days) compared to control group (7.0 +/- 2.3 days). The cost of treatment in the intervention group was US dollar (USD) 4,552.57 +/- 1,222.6 compared with that in the control group USD 6,529.9 +/- 1,505.04. Conclusions: Topical TXA is a viable, cost-effective method of decreasing perioperative blood loss in major spine surgery with fewer overall complications than other methods. Further studies are required to find the ideal dosage and timing.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Topical Injection of Tranexamic Acid via a Drain Plus Drain-Clamping to Reduce Blood Loss in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Surgery
    Liang, Jinqian
    Rong, Tianhua
    Liu, Hongzhe
    Tan, Mingsheng
    Zhao, Hong
    Liu, Xiangyang
    Chang, Lei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss During Primary Lumbar Spinal Surgery A Retrospective Case Control Study
    Ren, Zhinan
    Li, Shugang
    Sheng, Lin
    Zhuang, Qianyu
    Li, Zheng
    Xu, Derong
    Chen, Xin
    Jiang, Pengxiang
    Zhang, Xiao
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (23) : 1779 - 1784
  • [23] Tranexamic acid for reducing intra- and postoperative blood loss in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Is it safe enough?
    Li, Yi-Syuan
    Chen, Chun-Yu
    Chen, Chi-Hui
    Yao, Zhi-Kang
    Sung, Yu-Hsiang
    Lin, Kai-Cheng
    Tarng, Yih-Wen
    Hsu, Chien-Jen
    Renn, Jenn-Huei
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (02) : 226 - 227
  • [24] Combined use of tranexamic acid and rivaroxaban in posterior lumbar interbody fusion safely reduces blood loss and transfusion rates without increasing the risk of thrombosis-a prospective, stratified, randomized, controlled trial
    Zhang, Lu
    Li, Yanming
    Liu, Dong
    Xiao, Xing
    Guan, Tingjin
    Yue, Hongwei
    Xue, Haipeng
    Zhou, Hongming
    Jiao, Guangjun
    Wu, Wenliang
    Wang, Hongliang
    Liu, Haichun
    Meng, Chunyang
    Sun, Zhaozhong
    Chen, Yunzhen
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (10) : 2079 - 2087
  • [25] Outcomes of patients undergoing single-level arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Khalid, Syed I.
    Deysher, Daniel
    Thompson, Kyle
    Ostrov, Philip B.
    Hossa, Jessica
    Mirpuri, Pranav
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2023, 165 (07) : 1915 - 1921
  • [26] Intravenous versus oral tranexamic acid in elderly transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion patients: A prospective cohort study
    Li, Xu
    Yin, Yan
    Wen, Mohan
    Lu, Xiangjun
    Qin, Ru-Jie
    Lv, You
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 246
  • [27] When to remove? Evaluation of postoperative drainage volume after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Egenolf, Philipp
    Lenz, Maximilian
    Schnake, Klaus John
    Harland, Arne
    Oikonomidis, Stavros
    Eysel, Peer
    Scheyerer, Max Joseph
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 37 : 1 - 4
  • [28] Hidden blood loss in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgery
    Ju, H.
    Hart, R. A.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (01) : 67 - 70
  • [29] A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study
    Wu, Junlong
    Zhang, Chao
    Lu, Kang
    Li, Changqing
    Zhou, Yue
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2019, 22 (06) : E587 - E599
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Luan, Haopeng
    Liu, Kai
    Peng, Cong
    Tian, Qi
    Song, Xinghua
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)