Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols Based on Different Models in MANET

被引:0
|
作者
Sainy, Satyam Kumar [1 ]
Chaudhary, Ravi Rai [1 ]
Kumar, Ajay [2 ]
机构
[1] Dept CSE, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] GIDA Gorakhpur, Dept CSE, ITM, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT TRENDS IN ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (RTEICT) | 2016年
关键词
AODV; DSR; Delay; LAR1; MANET; PDR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A mobile adhoc network is an independent system of mobile stations associated by wireless link to form a system. This system can be modeled in the form of an uninformed graph. Adhoc networks are peer to peer, multihope networks were data packets are transmitted to a source to destination through intermediate nodes (which serve as router). The infrastructure is not the main issue to setup MANET and it can be setup anytime, anywhere. This paper presents the comparison of AODV, LAR1 and DSR routing protocols with three different models like increasing the number of nodes, increasing the pause time and increasing the speed of nodes. Performance of the above mentioned work are done on the attributes like throughput, packet delivery ratio, drop ratio and end-to-end delay). The performance of these three routing protocols is done on Glomosim Simulator and we concluded LAR1 has better throughput in comparison to both AODV and DSR routing protocols in all three scenario. Packet delivery Ratio behaves like throughput, LAR1 has better PDR in comparison to AODV and DSR. Drop ratio is also similar to PDR, actually it is reverse of PDR so we can say that LAR1 has lower drop ratio in comparison to AODV and DSR. AODV and DSR have lower delay in comparison to LAR1. LAR1 routing protocol has higher delay, and it is also seen that as we increase the nodes, pause time and mobility delay is also increase.
引用
收藏
页码:1666 / 1670
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ADHOC NETWORKS WITH DIFFERENT MULTICAST ROUTING PROTOCOLS AND MOBILITY MODELS
    Malarkodi, B.
    Gopal, P.
    Venkataramani, B.
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN RECENT TECHNOLOGIES IN COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTING (ARTCOM 2009), 2009, : 81 - 84
  • [42] Scenario Based Performance and Comparative Simulation Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANET
    Gupta, Vikas
    Verma, Ashok
    Lala, Ajay
    Chaurasia, Ashish
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2013, 13 (06): : 98 - 104
  • [43] Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Routing Protocols Against Network Layer Attacks in MANET
    Chandra, Apoorva
    Thakur, Sanjeev
    2015 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEXT GENERATION COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (NGCT), 2015, : 239 - 244
  • [44] Random Waypoint Mobility Model based Performance Estimation of On-Demand Routing Protocols in MANET for CBR Applications
    Maurya, Ashish K.
    Singh, Dinesh
    Kumar, Ajeet
    Maurya, Ritesh
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2014, : 835 - 839
  • [45] Investigating the Impact of Traffic Type on the Performance of on Demand Routing Protocols and Power Consumption in MANET
    Odih, Uchenna
    Bakalis, Panos
    Rapajic, Predrag
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL AFRO-EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR INDUSTRIAL ADVANCEMENT (AECIA 2015), 2016, 427 : 689 - 703
  • [46] Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols for RWP Mobility Model with Different Speed
    Singh, Neelam
    Shrivastava, Laxmi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE GENERATION COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING, 2015, 8 (05): : 189 - 194
  • [47] QoS Support in Routing Protocols for MANET
    Hosek, Jiri
    Kovac, Dominik
    Vajsar, Pavel
    Potfay, Attila
    2013 36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (TSP), 2013, : 118 - 122
  • [48] A comparative analysis of MANET routing protocols over TCP
    Atri, Niharika
    Goyal, Rohit
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, INSTRUMENTATION, COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICCICCT), 2015, : 712 - 717
  • [49] Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols for RWP Mobility Model with Different Speed
    Singh, Neelam
    Shrivastava, Laxmi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE GENERATION COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING, 2016, 9 (02): : 95 - 102
  • [50] Evaluating MANET Routing Protocols Under Multimedia Traffic
    Kadam, Ajinkya D.
    Wagh, Sharad S.
    2013 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2013,