Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure variability in people with diabetes

被引:16
作者
Bell, Katy J. L. [1 ]
Azizi, Lamiae [2 ]
Nilsson, Peter M. [3 ]
Hayen, Andrew [4 ]
Irwig, Les [1 ]
Ostgren, Carl J. [5 ]
Sundrom, Johan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Univ Hosp, Malmo, Sweden
[4] UTS, Australian Ctr Publ & Populat Hlth Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
TO-VISIT VARIABILITY; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; PRIMARY-CARE; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; EPISODIC HYPERTENSION; RISK; PREDICTION; EVENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0194084
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Blood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with risk of cardiovascular events in observational studies, independently of mean BP levels. In states with higher autonomic imbalance, such as in diabetes, the importance of BP variability may theoretically be even greater. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of BPV for prediction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods We identified 9,855 patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease who did not change BP-lowering treatment during the observation period from a Swedish primary health care cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. BPV was summarized as the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), or variation independent of mean (VIM). Patients were followed for a median of 4 years and associations with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results BPV was not associated with cardiovascular specific or all-cause mortality in the total sample. In patients who were not on BP-lowering drugs during the observation period (n = 2,949), variability measures were associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratios were 1.05, 1.04 and 1.05 for 50% increases in SD, CV and VIM, respectively, adjusted for Framingham risk score risk factors, including mean BP. However, the addition of the variability measures in this subgroup only led to very minimal improvement in discrimination, indicating they may have limited clinical usefulness (change in C-statistic ranged from 0.000-0.003 in all models). Conclusions Although BPV was independently associated with all-cause mortality in diabetes patients in primary care who did not have pre-existing cardiovascular disease or BP-lowering drugs, it may be of minimal clinical usefulness above and beyond that of other routinely measured predictors, including mean BP.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK PROFILES
    ANDERSON, KM
    ODELL, PM
    WILSON, PWF
    KANNEL, WB
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 121 (01) : 293 - 298
  • [2] Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk
    Bell, Katy
    Hayen, Andrew
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Neal, Bruce
    Irwig, Les
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 1474 - 1485
  • [3] Ambulatory blood pressure adds little to Framingham Risk Score for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older men: secondary analysis of observational study data
    Bell, Katy J. L.
    Beller, Elaine
    Sundstrom, Johan
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Hayen, Andrew
    Irwig, Les
    Neal, Bruce
    Glasziou, Paul
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (09):
  • [4] General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care - The Framingham Heart Study
    D'Agostino, Ralph B.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Wolf, Philip A.
    Cobain, Mark
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Kannel, William B.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (06) : 743 - 753
  • [5] Effects of Visit-to-Visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure on Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus The ADVANCE Trial
    Hata, Jun
    Arima, Hisatomi
    Rothwell, Peter M.
    Woodward, Mark
    Zoungas, Sophia
    Anderson, Craig
    Patel, Anushka
    Neal, Bruce
    Glasziou, Paul
    Hamet, Pavel
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    Poulter, Neil
    Williams, Bryan
    MacMahon, Stephen
    Chalmers, John
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (12) : 1325 - 1334
  • [6] Visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure strongly predicts all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 5•5-year prospective analysis
    Hsieh, Yi-Ting
    Tu, Shih-Te
    Cho, Tzu-Jung
    Chang, Shun-Jen
    Chen, Jung-Fu
    Hsieh, Ming-Chia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2012, 42 (03) : 245 - 253
  • [7] Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability as a prognostic marker in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases - Relationships and comparisons with vascular markers of atherosclerosis
    Lau, Kui Kai
    Wong, Yuen Kwun
    Chan, Yap Hang
    Teo, Kay Cheong
    Chan, Koon Ho
    Li, Leonard Sheung Wai
    Cheung, Raymond Tak Fai
    Siu, Chung Wah
    Ho, Shu Leong
    Tse, Hung Fat
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2014, 235 (01) : 230 - 235
  • [8] External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register
    Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
    Andersson, Eva
    Ekbom, Anders
    Feychting, Maria
    Kim, Jeong-Lim
    Reuterwall, Christina
    Heurgren, Mona
    Olausson, Petra Otterblad
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [9] MCKINLAY S, 1994, J HUM HYPERTENS, V8, P887
  • [10] Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Kengne, Andre Pascal
    Woodward, Mark
    Royston, Patrick
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    [J]. HEART, 2012, 98 (09) : 683 - 690