A comparative study of the hovering efficiency of flapping and revolving wings

被引:47
|
作者
Zheng, L. [1 ]
Hedrick, T. [2 ]
Mittal, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD; MANDUCA-SEXTA; AERODYNAMICS; HAWKMOTH; FLIGHT; AIR; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-3182/8/3/036001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Direct numerical simulations are used to explore the hovering performance and efficiency for hawkmoth-inspired flapping and revolving wings at Reynolds (Re) numbers varying from 50 to 4800. This range covers the gamut from small (fruit fly size) to large (hawkmoth size) flying insects and is also relevant to the design of micro-and nano-aerial vehicles. The flapping wing configuration chosen here corresponds to a hovering hawkmoth and the model is derived from high-speed videogrammetry of this insect. The revolving wing configuration also employs the wings of the hawkmoth but these are arranged in a dual-blade configuration typical of helicopters. Flow for both of these configurations is simulated over the range of Reynolds numbers of interest and the aerodynamic performance of the two compared. The comparison of these two seemingly different configurations raises issues regarding the appropriateness of various performance metrics and even characteristic scales; these are also addressed in the current study. Finally, the difference in the performance between the two is correlated with the flow physics of the two configurations. The study indicates that viscous forces dominate the aerodynamic power expenditure of the revolving wing to a degree not observed for the flapping wing. Consequently, the lift-to-power metric of the revolving wing declines rapidly with decreasing Reynolds numbers resulting in a hovering performance that is at least a factor of 2 lower than the flapping wing at Reynolds numbers less than about 100.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hovering efficiency comparison of rotary and flapping flight for rigid rectangular wings via dimensionless multi-objective optimization
    Bayiz, Yagiz
    Ghanaatpishe, Mohammad
    Fathy, Hosam
    Cheng, Bo
    BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS, 2018, 13 (04)
  • [22] Effects of Stroke Amplitude and Wing Planform on the Aerodynamic Performance of Hovering Flapping Wings
    Li, Hao
    Nabawy, Mostafa R. A.
    AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (09)
  • [23] Effects of shapes and kinematics of hovering flapping wings on aerodynamic forces and vortex structures
    Kwon, Hyun Ki
    Chang, Jo Won
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [24] PASSIVE PITCHING MECHANISM OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLAPPING WINGS IN HOVERING FLIGHT
    Li, Chengyu
    Wang, Junshi
    Liu, Geng
    Deng, Xiaolong
    Dong, Haibo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME/JSME/KSME JOINT FLUIDS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 2, 2019,
  • [25] Scaling of the Performance of Passive-Pitching Robotic Flapping Wings in Hovering Flight
    Wu, K.
    Nowak, J.
    Breuer, K. S.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 59 : E254 - E254
  • [26] Experimental investigation of the effect of chordwise flexibility on the aerodynamics of flapping wings in hovering flight
    Mazaheri, K.
    Ebrahimi, A.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2010, 26 (04) : 544 - 558
  • [27] Effects of flexibility on the hovering performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios
    Shahzad, Aamer
    Tian, Fang-Bao
    Young, John
    Lai, Joseph C. S.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 81 : 69 - 96
  • [28] Numerical study of sound generation by three-dimensional flexible flapping wings during hovering flight
    Wang, Li
    Tian, Fang-Bao
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 99
  • [29] Three-dimensional vortex wake structure of flapping wings in hovering flight
    Cheng, Bo
    Roll, Jesse
    Liu, Yun
    Troolin, Daniel R.
    Deng, Xinyan
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2014, 11 (91)
  • [30] STUDY OF MECHANICS OF FLAPPING WINGS
    BETTERIDGE, DS
    ARCHER, RD
    AERONAUTICAL QUARTERLY, 1974, 25 (MAY): : 129 - 142