In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing - part 1: interpretative models and laboratory testing

被引:6
|
作者
Meijer, G. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bengough, G. [1 ,2 ]
Knappett, J. [1 ]
Loades, K. [2 ]
Nicoll, B. [3 ]
Mukov, I. [1 ]
Zhang, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Div Civil Engn, Dundee, Scotland
[2] James Hutton Inst, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Northern Res Stn, Forest Res, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
GEOTECHNIQUE | 2018年 / 68卷 / 04期
关键词
in situ testing; penetrometers; vegetation; SLOPE STABILITY; FOREST STANDS; TREE ROOTS; REINFORCEMENT; ARCHITECTURE; GROWTH; SPRUCE; MORPHOLOGY; SYSTEM; FINE;
D O I
10.1680/jgeot.16.P.203
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Root architecture and reinforcement are important parameters to measure the safety of vegetated slopes and stream banks against slope instability and erosion or to assess the stability of plants against environmental loading (e.g. windthrow of trees). However, these are difficult to measure without time-consuming sampling or counting procedures. Previous studies proposed using a penetrometer with an adapted geometry, and showed that individual root breakages could be detected as sudden drops in penetrometer resistance. However, there are no existing models to derive root properties from the measured traces. Here, several interpretative models are developed and their performance at identifying and characterising buried acrylonitrile butadiene styrene root analogues of varying diameter and architecture in sand are assessed. It was found that models, assuming the analogues broke in bending rather than tension, provided good predictions for the force-displacement behaviour. The simple analytical bending model developed here was shown to perform almost as well as more sophisticated numerical models. For all models, the predictions of additional penetrometer force required to break the root analogue were more accurate than predictions for lateral root displacement required to reach failure. The root analogue diameter and to a lesser extent the soil resistance and root angle were shown to affect the penetrometer resistance strongly. Root branching, root length and the distance between the point of load application and a root boundary (root tip or parent root) had a much smaller effect. When the root failure mechanism, root strength, root stiffness and soil resistance are known, an accurate prediction of the root diameter can be made based on the root peak resistance value identified from a blade penetration test. Penetrometer testing, a test which is easy to perform in the field, coupled with an accurate interpretative model might therefore be an effective method to rapidly quantify the spatial distribution, depths and diameters of roots.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 319
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] In situ root identification through blade penetrometer testing - part 2: field testing
    Meijer, G. J.
    Bengough, G.
    Knappett, J.
    Loades, K.
    Nicoll, B.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2018, 68 (04): : 320 - 331
  • [2] In-situ and laboratory testing for predicting net infiltration through tailings
    Swanson, DA
    Savci, G
    Danziger, G
    TAILINGS AND MINE WASTE '00, 2000, : 243 - 251
  • [3] Testing and modeling of solders using new test device, part 1: Models and testing
    Desai, CS
    Wang, ZC
    Whitenack, R
    Kundu, T
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING, 2004, 126 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [4] Evaluation of Fatigue Models of Hot-Mix Asphalt Through Laboratory Testing
    Adhikari, Sanjeev
    Shen, Shihui
    You, Zhanping
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2127) : 36 - 42
  • [5] Damage assessment of concrete structures through dynamic testing methods. Part 1-Laboratory tests
    Maas, Stefan
    Zuerbes, Arno
    Waldmann, Daniele
    Waltering, Markus
    Bungard, Volker
    De Roeck, G.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 34 : 351 - 362
  • [6] Geotechnical investigation and testing — laboratory testing of soil — part 12: Determination of liquid and plastic limits amendment 1
    Geotechnical investigation and testing — laboratory testing of soil — part 12: Determination of liquid and plastic limits amendment 1, 2021,
  • [7] Unit root testing in integer-valued AR(1) models
    Hellström, J
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 70 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [8] Laboratory and In-Situ testing for the identification of bonding parameters of GFRP pipes and soil nailing systems
    Zenti, Carla L.
    Sterpi, Donatella
    SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION, UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES AND RETAINING WALLS, 2014, 4 : 374 - 381
  • [9] Investigation of a limestone pillar failure - Part 1: Geology, laboratory testing and numerical modeling
    Alber, M
    Heiland, J
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2001, 34 (03) : 167 - 186
  • [10] The ETACS European project for testing the comparability of sensors and analysers -: Part 1:: Laboratory tests
    Ríos, A
    Lynggaard-Jensen, A
    Jacobsen, HS
    Whiteman, R
    Wacheux, H
    Karlberg, B
    Lindholm, AB
    Stenstrom, T
    Berridge, H
    Boenke, A
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 1999, 4 (12) : 512 - 517