Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for Multiple Outcome Mixed Treatment Comparisons

被引:62
|
作者
Hong, Hwanhee [1 ]
Carlin, Bradley P. [1 ]
Shamliyan, Tatyana A. [2 ]
Wyman, Jean F. [2 ]
Ramakrishnan, Rema [2 ]
Sainfort, Francois [2 ]
Kane, Robert L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
nephrology; Bayesian meta-analysis; comparative effectiveness; systematic reviews; hierarchical models; ISPOR TASK-FORCE; NETWORK METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X13481110
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. Bayesian statistical methods are increasingly popular as a tool for meta-analysis of clinical trial data involving both direct and indirect treatment comparisons. However, appropriate selection of prior distributions for unknown model parameters and checking of consistency assumptions required for modeling remain particularly challenging. We compared Bayesian and traditional frequentist statistical methods for mixed treatment comparisons with multiple binary outcomes. Data. We searched major electronic bibliographic databases, Food and Drug Administration reviews, trial registries, and research grant databases up to December 2011 to find randomized studies published in English that examined drugs for female urgency urinary incontinence (UI) on continence, improvement in UI, and treatment discontinuation due to harm. Methods. We describe and fit fixed and random effects models in both Bayesian and frequentist statistical frameworks. In a hierarchical model of 8 treatments, we separately analyze 1 safety and 2 efficacy outcomes. We produce Bayesian and frequentist treatment ranks and odds ratios across all drug v placebo comparisons, as well as Bayesian probabilities that each drug is best overall through a weighted scoring rule that trades off efficacy and safety. Results. In our study, Bayesian and frequentist random effects models generally suggest the same drugs as most attractive, although neither suggests any significant differences between drugs. However, the Bayesian methods more consistently identify one drug (propiverine) as best overall, produce interval estimates that are generally better at capturing all sources of uncertainty in the data, and also permit attractive rankograms that visually capture the probability that each drug assumes each possible rank. Conclusions. Bayesian methods are more flexible and their results more clinically interpretable, but they require more careful development and specialized software.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 714
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The importance of considering differences in study and patient characteristics before undertaking indirect treatment comparisons: a case study of siponimod for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
    Samjoo, Imtiaz A.
    Worthington, Evelyn
    Haltner, Anja
    Cameron, Chris
    Nicholas, Richard
    Dahlke, Frank
    Adlard, Nicholas
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 (07) : 1145 - 1156
  • [43] Bayesian meta-analysis for evaluating treatment effectiveness in biomarker subgroups using trials of mixed patient populations
    Wheaton, Lorna
    Jackson, Dan
    Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (04) : 543 - 560
  • [44] Brain volume loss in relapsing multiple sclerosis: indirect treatment comparisons of available disease-modifying therapies
    Zivadinov, Robert
    Keenan, Alexander J.
    Le, Hoa H.
    Ait-Tihyaty, Maria
    Gandhi, Kavita
    Zierhut, Matthew L.
    Salvo-Halloran, Elizabeth M.
    Ramirez, Abril Oliva
    Vuong, Vivian
    Singh, Sumeet
    Hutton, Brian
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] Comparing the Efficacy of Multiple Drugs Injection for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloid: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Wenhao Wu
    Yang Zhao
    Yuxuan Chen
    Aimei Zhong
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 465 - 472
  • [46] Comparing the Efficacy of Multiple Drugs Injection for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloid: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Wenhao
    Zhao, Yang
    Chen, Yuxuan
    Zhong, Aimei
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (01) : 465 - 472
  • [47] Vibration of effects resulting from treatment selection in mixed-treatment comparisons: a multiverse analysis on network meta-analyses of antidepressants in major depressive disorder
    Vinatier, Constant
    Palpacuer, Clement
    Scanff, Alexandre
    Naudet, Florian
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (05) : 324 - 332
  • [48] A Bayesian Mixed-Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis of Treatments for Alcohol Dependence and Implications for Planning Future Trials
    DeSantis, Stacia M.
    Zhu, Huirong
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (07) : 899 - 910
  • [49] Edoxaban in the Evolving Scenario of Non Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Imputed Placebo Analysis and Multiple Treatment Comparisons
    Verdecchia, Paolo
    Angeli, Fabio
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Reboldi, Gianpaolo
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [50] Comparing the long-term efficacy of standard and combined minimally invasive procedures for unresectable HCC: a mixed treatment comparison
    Zhao, Jianghai
    Zhang, Hui
    Wei, Lunshou
    Xie, Shuping
    Suo, Zhimin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (09) : 15101 - 15113