Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for Multiple Outcome Mixed Treatment Comparisons

被引:64
作者
Hong, Hwanhee [1 ]
Carlin, Bradley P. [1 ]
Shamliyan, Tatyana A. [2 ]
Wyman, Jean F. [2 ]
Ramakrishnan, Rema [2 ]
Sainfort, Francois [2 ]
Kane, Robert L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
nephrology; Bayesian meta-analysis; comparative effectiveness; systematic reviews; hierarchical models; ISPOR TASK-FORCE; NETWORK METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X13481110
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. Bayesian statistical methods are increasingly popular as a tool for meta-analysis of clinical trial data involving both direct and indirect treatment comparisons. However, appropriate selection of prior distributions for unknown model parameters and checking of consistency assumptions required for modeling remain particularly challenging. We compared Bayesian and traditional frequentist statistical methods for mixed treatment comparisons with multiple binary outcomes. Data. We searched major electronic bibliographic databases, Food and Drug Administration reviews, trial registries, and research grant databases up to December 2011 to find randomized studies published in English that examined drugs for female urgency urinary incontinence (UI) on continence, improvement in UI, and treatment discontinuation due to harm. Methods. We describe and fit fixed and random effects models in both Bayesian and frequentist statistical frameworks. In a hierarchical model of 8 treatments, we separately analyze 1 safety and 2 efficacy outcomes. We produce Bayesian and frequentist treatment ranks and odds ratios across all drug v placebo comparisons, as well as Bayesian probabilities that each drug is best overall through a weighted scoring rule that trades off efficacy and safety. Results. In our study, Bayesian and frequentist random effects models generally suggest the same drugs as most attractive, although neither suggests any significant differences between drugs. However, the Bayesian methods more consistently identify one drug (propiverine) as best overall, produce interval estimates that are generally better at capturing all sources of uncertainty in the data, and also permit attractive rankograms that visually capture the probability that each drug assumes each possible rank. Conclusions. Bayesian methods are more flexible and their results more clinically interpretable, but they require more careful development and specialized software.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 714
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INC 4 INT CONS INC P
[2]  
[Anonymous], 4 NICE DSU
[3]   Economics of individualization in comparative effectiveness research and a basis for a patient-centered health care [J].
Basu, Anirban .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 30 (03) :549-559
[4]   Bayesian Meta-Analyses for Comparative Effectiveness and Informing Coverage Decisions [J].
Berry, Scott M. ;
Ishak, K. Jack ;
Luce, Bryan R. ;
Berry, Donald A. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2010, 48 (06) :S137-S144
[5]  
*BROOK I, 2009, IMPL COMP EFF RES PR
[6]  
Carlin BP, 2009, CH CRC TEXT STAT SCI, V78, P1
[7]   Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis [J].
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Barbui, Corrado ;
Salanti, Georgia ;
Rendell, Jennifer ;
Brown, Rachel ;
Stockton, Sarah ;
Purgato, Marianna ;
Spineli, Loukia M. ;
Goodwin, Guy M. ;
Geddes, John R. .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9799) :1306-1315
[8]  
Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization Institute of Medicine, 2009, IN NAT PRIOR COMP EF, DOI [10.17226/12648, DOI 10.17226/12648]
[9]   Frequency of Treatment-Effect Modification Affecting Indirect Comparisons A Systematic Review [J].
Coory, Michael ;
Jordan, Susan .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (09) :723-732
[10]   The impact of overactive bladder on mental health, work productivity and health-related quality of life in the UK and Sweden: results from EpiLUTS [J].
Coyne, Karin S. ;
Sexton, Chris C. ;
Kopp, Zoe S. ;
Ebel-Bitoun, Caty ;
Milsom, Ian ;
Chapple, Chris .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) :1459-1471