Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:41
|
作者
Fedorov, Andriy [1 ]
Tuncali, Kemal [1 ]
Fennessy, Fiona M. [1 ]
Tokuda, Junichi [1 ]
Hata, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Wells, William M. [1 ]
Kikinis, Ron [1 ]
Tempany, Clare M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Surg Planning Lab, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; image-guided interventions; prostate biopsy; image registration; nonrigid registration; mutual information; performance characterization; DEFORMABLE ORGAN REGISTRATION; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; 3; T; CANCER; FEASIBILITY; TRUS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.23688
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and evaluate image registration methodology for automated re-identification of tumor-suspicious foci from preprocedural MR exams during MR-guided transperineal prostate core biopsy. Materials and Methods: A hierarchical approach for automated registration between planning and intra-procedural T2-weighted prostate MRI was developed and evaluated on the images acquired during 10 consecutive MR-guided biopsies. Registration accuracy was quantified at image-based landmarks and by evaluating spatial overlap for the manually segmented prostate and sub-structures. Registration reliability was evaluated by simulating initial mis-registration and analyzing the convergence behavior. Registration precision was characterized at the planned biopsy targets. Results: The total computation time was compatible with a clinical setting, being at most 2 min. Deformable registration led to a significant improvement in spatial overlap of the prostate and peripheral zone contours compared with both rigid and affine registration. Average in-slice landmark registration error was 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm. Experiments simulating initial mis-registration resulted in an estimated average capture range of 6 mm and an average in-slice registration precision of +/-0.3 mm. Conclusion: Our registration approach requires minimum user interaction and is compatible with the time constraints of our interventional clinical workflow. The initial evaluation shows acceptable accuracy, reliability and consistency of the method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:987992. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biopsy Needle Artifact Localization in MRI-Guided Robotic Transrectal Prostate Intervention
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Cho, Nathan Bongjoon
    Iordachita, Iulian I.
    Guion, Peter
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Camphausen, Kevin
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 59 (07) : 1902 - 1911
  • [42] Direct Comparison of Targeted MRI-Guided Biopsy with Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Patients with Previous Negative Prostate Biopsies
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Kruck, Stephan
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Gatidis, Sergios
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Roethke, Matthias
    Scharpf, Marcus
    Schilling, David
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [43] Perilesional Targeted Biopsy Combined with MRI-TRUS Image Fusion-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy: An Analysis According to PI-RADS Scores
    Tomioka, Masayuki
    Seike, Kensaku
    Uno, Hiromi
    Asano, Nami
    Watanabe, Haruo
    Tomioka-Inagawa, Risa
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kato, Daiki
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Nakane, Keita
    Tsuchiya, Kunihiro
    Ito, Takayasu
    Koie, Takuya
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)
  • [44] Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy
    Brown, Anna M.
    Elbuluk, Osama
    Mertan, Francesca
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (06): : 1788 - 1799
  • [45] Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy
    Anna M. Brown
    Osama Elbuluk
    Francesca Mertan
    Sandeep Sankineni
    Daniel J. Margolis
    Bradford J. Wood
    Peter A. Pinto
    Peter L. Choyke
    Baris Turkbey
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 1788 - 1799
  • [46] Single Slice US-MRI Registration for Neurosurgical MRI-Guided US
    Pardasani, Utsav
    Baxter, John S. H.
    Peters, Terry M.
    Khan, Ali R.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2016, 9786
  • [47] Fully automatic deformable registration of pretreatment MRI/CT for image-guided prostate radiotherapy planning
    Hamdan, Iyas
    Bert, Julien
    Le Rest, Catherine Cheze
    Tasu, Jean Pierre
    Boussion, Nicolas
    Valeri, Antoine
    Dardenne, Guillaume
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (12) : 6447 - 6455
  • [48] Application of 16 G Biopsy Needle in Transperineal Template-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Ding, Xue-fei
    Luan, Yang
    Xia, An-le
    Zhu, Liang-yong
    Xiao, Qin
    Chen, Ji
    Chen, Hao-peng
    Han, Yue-xing
    Liu, Zhong
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, : 909 - 913
  • [49] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy of the prostate - defining the optimal number of cores needed
    Gross, Moritz
    Eisenhuber, Edith
    Assinger, Petra
    Schima, Raphael
    Susani, Martin
    Doblhammer, Stefan
    Schima, Wolfgang
    CANCER IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [50] MRI-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Results
    Overduin, Christiaan G.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 14 (03) : 209 - 213