Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:41
|
作者
Fedorov, Andriy [1 ]
Tuncali, Kemal [1 ]
Fennessy, Fiona M. [1 ]
Tokuda, Junichi [1 ]
Hata, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Wells, William M. [1 ]
Kikinis, Ron [1 ]
Tempany, Clare M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Surg Planning Lab, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; image-guided interventions; prostate biopsy; image registration; nonrigid registration; mutual information; performance characterization; DEFORMABLE ORGAN REGISTRATION; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; 3; T; CANCER; FEASIBILITY; TRUS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.23688
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and evaluate image registration methodology for automated re-identification of tumor-suspicious foci from preprocedural MR exams during MR-guided transperineal prostate core biopsy. Materials and Methods: A hierarchical approach for automated registration between planning and intra-procedural T2-weighted prostate MRI was developed and evaluated on the images acquired during 10 consecutive MR-guided biopsies. Registration accuracy was quantified at image-based landmarks and by evaluating spatial overlap for the manually segmented prostate and sub-structures. Registration reliability was evaluated by simulating initial mis-registration and analyzing the convergence behavior. Registration precision was characterized at the planned biopsy targets. Results: The total computation time was compatible with a clinical setting, being at most 2 min. Deformable registration led to a significant improvement in spatial overlap of the prostate and peripheral zone contours compared with both rigid and affine registration. Average in-slice landmark registration error was 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm. Experiments simulating initial mis-registration resulted in an estimated average capture range of 6 mm and an average in-slice registration precision of +/-0.3 mm. Conclusion: Our registration approach requires minimum user interaction and is compatible with the time constraints of our interventional clinical workflow. The initial evaluation shows acceptable accuracy, reliability and consistency of the method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:987992. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Huang, Haifeng
    Wang, Wei
    Lin, Tingsheng
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhao, Xiaozhi
    Lian, Huibo
    Guo, Hongqian
    BMC UROLOGY, 2016, 16 : 1 - 6
  • [22] MRI-GUIDED, TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY USING FIXED COORDINATE NEEDLE GUIDE: INITIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Kulkarni, Pankaj
    Laha, Sumit
    Sikander, Sakura
    Biswas, Pradipta
    Cornnell, Heather
    Bagci, Ulas
    Burt, Jeremy
    Song, Sang-Eun
    2019 DESIGN OF MEDICAL DEVICES CONFERENCE, 2019,
  • [23] Segmented diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Application to transperineal in-bore 3 T MR image-guided targeted biopsy
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Panych, Lawrence P.
    Fairhurst, Janice
    Hassanzadeh, Elmira
    Seethamraju, Ravi T.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Maier, Stephan E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (08) : 1146 - 1154
  • [24] MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Woodrum, David A.
    Gorny, Krzysztof R.
    Greenwood, Bernadette
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (03) : 196 - 205
  • [25] MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle
    van den Bosch, Michiel R.
    Moman, Maaike R.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Battermann, Jan J.
    Duiveman, Ed
    van Schelven, Leonard J.
    de Leeuw, Hendrik
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    Moerland, Marinus A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (05) : N133 - N140
  • [26] Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate
    Sivaraman, Arjun
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Barret, Eric
    Ahallal, Youness
    Rozet, Francois
    Galiano, Marc
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 146 - 151
  • [27] MRI-guided and robotic-assisted prostate biopsy
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 316 - 319
  • [28] Accuracy validation for MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy
    Xu, Helen
    Lasso, Andras
    Vikal, Siddharth
    Guion, Peter
    Krieger, Axel
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND MODELING, 2010, 7625
  • [29] Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Valentin, B.
    Hiester, A.
    Blondin, D.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6965 - 6970
  • [30] MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy
    Roethke, M.
    Anastasiadis, A. G.
    Lichy, M.
    Werner, M.
    Wagner, P.
    Kruck, S.
    Claussen, Claus D.
    Stenzl, A.
    Schlemmer, H. P.
    Schilling, D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 213 - 218