Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:41
|
作者
Fedorov, Andriy [1 ]
Tuncali, Kemal [1 ]
Fennessy, Fiona M. [1 ]
Tokuda, Junichi [1 ]
Hata, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Wells, William M. [1 ]
Kikinis, Ron [1 ]
Tempany, Clare M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Surg Planning Lab, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; image-guided interventions; prostate biopsy; image registration; nonrigid registration; mutual information; performance characterization; DEFORMABLE ORGAN REGISTRATION; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; 3; T; CANCER; FEASIBILITY; TRUS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.23688
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and evaluate image registration methodology for automated re-identification of tumor-suspicious foci from preprocedural MR exams during MR-guided transperineal prostate core biopsy. Materials and Methods: A hierarchical approach for automated registration between planning and intra-procedural T2-weighted prostate MRI was developed and evaluated on the images acquired during 10 consecutive MR-guided biopsies. Registration accuracy was quantified at image-based landmarks and by evaluating spatial overlap for the manually segmented prostate and sub-structures. Registration reliability was evaluated by simulating initial mis-registration and analyzing the convergence behavior. Registration precision was characterized at the planned biopsy targets. Results: The total computation time was compatible with a clinical setting, being at most 2 min. Deformable registration led to a significant improvement in spatial overlap of the prostate and peripheral zone contours compared with both rigid and affine registration. Average in-slice landmark registration error was 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm. Experiments simulating initial mis-registration resulted in an estimated average capture range of 6 mm and an average in-slice registration precision of +/-0.3 mm. Conclusion: Our registration approach requires minimum user interaction and is compatible with the time constraints of our interventional clinical workflow. The initial evaluation shows acceptable accuracy, reliability and consistency of the method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:987992. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open Source Platform for Transperineal In-Bore MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Herz, Christian
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Fedorov, Andriy
    MacNeil, Kyle
    Behringer, Peter A.
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Mehrtash, Alireza
    Mousavi, Parvin
    Kikinis, Ron
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 67 (02) : 565 - 576
  • [2] Multi-slice-to-volume registration for MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Xu, Helen
    Lasso, Andras
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Tempany, Clare
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2015, 10 (05) : 563 - 572
  • [3] Multi-slice-to-volume registration for MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Helen Xu
    Andras Lasso
    Andriy Fedorov
    Kemal Tuncali
    Clare Tempany
    Gabor Fichtinger
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2015, 10 : 563 - 572
  • [4] In-bore setup and software for 3T MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Iordachita, Iulian
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Oguro, Sota
    Lasso, Andras
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (18) : 5823 - 5840
  • [5] Development of a Pneumatic Robot for MRI-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy and Brachytherapy: New Approaches
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Cho, Nathan B.
    Fischer, Gregory
    Hata, Nobuhito
    Tempany, Clare
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    Iordachita, Iulian
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2010, : 2580 - 2585
  • [6] Accuracy analysis in MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy
    Xu, Helen
    Lasso, Andras
    Guion, Peter
    Krieger, Axel
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Singh, Anurag K.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Coleman, Jonathan
    Grubb, Robert L., III
    Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste
    Menard, Cynthia
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2013, 8 (06) : 937 - 944
  • [7] Image registration for interventional MRI-guided minimally invasive treatment of prostate cancer
    Fei, BW
    Boll, DT
    Duerk, JL
    Wilson, DL
    SECOND JOINT EMBS-BMES CONFERENCE 2002, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: BIOENGINEERING - INTEGRATIVE METHODOLOGIES, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, : 1185 - 1185
  • [8] Standardised scoring of a multi-parametric 3-T MRI for a targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Arsov, C.
    Blondin, D.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Antoch, G.
    Albers, P.
    Quentin, M.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (06): : 848 - +
  • [9] Workflow Assessment of 3T MRI-guided Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsy using a Robotic Needle Guidance
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Fennessy, Fiona
    Tempany, Clare
    Yoshimitsu, Kitaro
    Magill, John
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2014, 9036
  • [10] A Study of Needle Image Artifact Localization in Confirmation Imaging of MRI-guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Cho, Nathan B.
    Iordachita, Iulian I.
    Guion, Peter
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2011,