International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study

被引:22
|
作者
Lovegrove, Josephine [1 ]
Fulbrook, Paul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Miles, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Paramed, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Qld, Australia
[2] Prince Charles Hosp, Nursing Res & Practice Dev Ctr, Chermside, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
critical care; intensive care unit; patient care bundles; pressure injury; pressure ulcer; AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL SHEEPSKIN; CRITICAL-CARE PATIENTS; INTENSIVE-CARE; ULCER PREVENTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; DRESSINGS; METHODOLOGY; RELIABILITY; ATTITUDES; STATE;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.13461
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
This modified Delphi study aimed to determine a minimum pressure injury preventative intervention set for implementation relative to critically ill patients' risk level. Preventative interventions were identified via systematic review, risk levels categorised by an intensive-care-specific risk-assessment-scale (COMHON Index), and panel members (n= 67) identified through an international critical care nursing body. Round 1: panel members were asked to rate implementation of 12 interventions according to risk level (low, moderate, high). Round 2: interventions were rated for use at the risk level which received greatest round 1 support. Round 3: interventions not yet achieving consensus were again rated, and discarded where consensus was not reached. Consensus indicated all patients should receive: risk assessment within 2-hours of admission; 8-hourly risk reassessment; and use of disposable incontinence pads. Additionally, moderate- and high-risk patients should receive: a reactive mattress support surface and a heel off-loading device. High-risk patients should also receive: nutritional supplements if eating orally; preventative dressings (sacral, heel, trochanteric); an active mattress support surface; and a pressure-redistributing cushion for sitting. Repositioning is required at least 4-hourly for low-risk, and 2-hourly for moderate- and high-risk patients. Rigorous application of the intervention set has the potential to decrease pressure injuries in intensive care.
引用
收藏
页码:1112 / 1127
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the safety of physical rehabilitation in critically ill patients: a Delphi study
    Woodbridge, Huw R.
    Mccarthy, Christopher J.
    Jones, Mandy
    Willis, Matthew
    Antcliffe, David B.
    Alexander, Caroline M.
    Gordon, Anthony C.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [22] Predictive ability of the EVARUCI scale and COMHON index for pressure injury risk in critically ill patients: A diagnostic accuracy study
    de los Angeles Leal-Felipe, M.
    del Carmen Arroyo-Lopez, M.
    del Cristo Robayna-Delgado, M.
    Gomez-Espejo, Ana
    Perera-Diaz, Patricia
    Chinea-Rodriguez, Carmen D.
    Garcia-Correa, Natalia
    Jimenez-Sosa, Alejandro
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 31 (06) : 355 - 361
  • [23] Intraoperative Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study
    O'Brien, Denise D.
    Shanks, Amy M.
    Talsma, AkkeNeel
    Brenner, Phyllis S.
    Ramachandran, Satya Krishna
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [24] Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients
    Theeranut, Ampornpan
    Ninbanphot, Suchada
    Limpawattana, Panita
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 26 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [25] Pressure injury prevention in adult critically ill patients: best practice implementation project
    Ramalho, Aline de Oliveira
    Santiago, Leidiane Moreira
    Meira, Luciana
    Marin, Alessandra
    de Oliveira, Larissa Bertacchini
    Puschel, Vilanice Alves de Araujo
    JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2023, 21 (03): : 218 - 228
  • [26] Defining effective communication for critically ill patients with an artificial airway: An international multi-professional consensus
    Zaga, Charissa J.
    Freeman-Sanderson, Amy
    Happ, Mary Beth
    Hoit, Jeannette D.
    McGrath, Brendan A.
    Pandian, Vinciya
    Quraishi-Akhtar, Tanviha
    Rose, Louise
    Sutt, Anna-Liisa
    Tuinman, Pieter R.
    Wallace, Sarah
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Berney, Sue
    Vogel, Adam P.
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 76
  • [27] Evaluation of the pressure ulcers risk scales with critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study
    Borghardt, Andressa Tomazini
    do Prado, Thiago Nascimento
    de Arajo, Thiago Moura
    Brunet Rogenski, Noemi Marisa
    de Oliveira Bringuente, Maria Edla
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2015, 23 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [28] Association between the mean perfusion pressure and the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Ling
    Qin, Shuangwen
    Lu, Xiuhong
    Huang, Liuyun
    Xie, Mingjie
    Huang, Debin
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [29] Association Between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Critically Ill Patients With Pressure Injury: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database
    Zhang, Yilei
    Qin, Chuan
    Xu, Li
    Zhao, Mengjia
    Zheng, Jinan
    Hua, Weilong
    Wei, Yutian
    Zhang, Guanghao
    Huang, Xiaoling
    Chen, Rundong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [30] THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MODIFIED NUTRITION RISK IN CRITICALLY ILL SCORE AND MORTALITY IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS
    Yildirimar, Arzu
    Demiroluk, Oznur
    Yigit Kuplay, Yildiz
    Meric, Yucel
    Turan, Guldem
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2019, 22 (02): : 222 - 227