AXIAL COMPRESSION TESTS ON LARGE-SCALE FRP-CONFINED RC COLUMNS

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Y. X. [1 ]
Teng, J. G. [1 ]
Lam, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL POSTGRADUATE CONFERENCE ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, VOL 2 | 2010年
关键词
FRP; RC columns; large-scale columns; strengthening; confinement; compression; stress-strain behaviour; REINFORCED-CONCRETE COLUMNS; STRESS-STRAIN MODEL; POLYMER JACKETS; BEHAVIOR; COMPOSITES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To enable the safe and reliable design of confining FRP jackets for the strengthening of RC columns, the stress strain behaviour of FRP-confmed concrete needs to be properly understood and modelled. While numerous studies have been conducted on FRP-confined concrete using small-scale FRP-confmed plain concrete specimens, uncertainties and concerns exist with regard to the direct extrapolation of conclusions reached in these studies to the behaviour of FRP-confined concrete in large-scale reinforced concrete (RC) columns on which there has been very limited work. Against this background, this paper presents the test results of part of an ongoing experimental programme on large-scale FRP-confined RC columns. The entire experimental programme comprising 16 axial compression tests on large-scale RC columns is first descried. Details of the four tests already completed are then reported and the results discussed. These results confirm the expected benefits of FRP confinement of RC columns in enhancing both their strength and ductility. As with small-scale plain concrete specimens, the hoop rupture strain of an FRP jacket in a large-scale RC column is much lower than the material ultimate tensile strain from flat coupon tests; this reduction appears to be more severe in large RC columns than in small plain concrete specimens. The completed tests have also shown that the instrumentation scheme needs to be refined in future tests to better capture the development of strains in the FRP jacket.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Behavior of FRP Ring-Confined CFST columns under axial compression
    Zeng, Jun-Jie
    Zheng, Yu-Wen
    Liu, Feng
    Guo, Yong-Chang
    Hou, Chao
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2021, 257
  • [32] Experimental testing and analytical modeling of CFRP-confined large circular RC columns subjected to cyclic axial compression
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Wang, Daiyu
    Smith, Scott T.
    Lu, Dagang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 40 : 64 - 74
  • [33] Axial strength of eccentrically loaded FRP-confined short concrete columns
    Jiang C.
    Wu Y.-F.
    Polym., 2020, 6
  • [34] Experimental investigation into FRP-confined concrete-filled steel tubular columns under axial compression
    Ma, Lu
    Zhou, Changlin
    Zhang, Ji
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2023, 75 (03) : 109 - 122
  • [35] Experimental analysis and design strength models adopted by international guides for FRP-confined concrete columns subjected to axial compression
    Gutierrez, J. P.
    Martinez, S.
    De Diego, A.
    Castro, V. J.
    Echevarria, L.
    MATERIALES DE CONSTRUCCION, 2021, 71 (344)
  • [36] Ultimate axial strain of FRP-confined concrete
    Lam, L
    Teng, JG
    ADVANCES IN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 789 - 796
  • [37] Confinement Coefficient Predictive Modeling of FRP-Confined RC Columns
    Naderpour, Hosein
    Mirrashid, Masoomeh
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2020, 9 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [38] Stress-strain model for concrete in FRP-confined steel tubular columns
    Teng, J. G.
    Hu, Y. M.
    Yu, T.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 49 : 156 - 167
  • [39] Behavior of Large-Scale Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Multitube Concrete Columns under Axial Compression
    Chan, C. W.
    Yu, T.
    Bai, Y. L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [40] Monotonic axial behavior and modelling of RC circular columns confined with CFRP
    Chastre, Carlos
    Silva, Manuel A. G.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (08) : 2268 - 2277