Rating Equity Funds against Return of Random Traders

被引:0
作者
Hung, Ta-Wei [1 ]
Wu, Mu-En [1 ]
Lu, Hsueh-, I [2 ]
Ho, Jan-Ming [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sinica, Inst Informat Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Acad Sinica, Res Ctr Informat Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
2013 ASE/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL COMPUTING (SOCIALCOM) | 2013年
关键词
Equity Fund Evaluation; Cumulative DistributionFunction Approximation; Rating Equity Funds; MUTUAL FUNDS; PERFORMANCE; MARKET; MANAGERS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we study the problem of benchmarking returns of equity funds. We present a novel approach, the random-trader scheme, to benchmark return of an equity fund during a specific period. A random trader uses all-inall- out strategy to trade in the market at random timing with capital being negligible as compared with the market size. In this paper, we study the problem of benchmarking returns of equity funds. We present a novel approach, the randomtrader scheme, to benchmark return of an equity fund during a specific period. A random trader uses all-in-all-out strategy to trade in the market at random timing with capital being negligible as compared with the market size. Let DRRT be the distribution of returns of random traders, and R-rt be a random variable sampling from DRRT. In this paper we model DRRT as a log-normal distribution, denoted as S-DRRT, and provide an efficient algorithm to compute the mean and variance of s DRRT, denoted as mu(DRRT) and sigma(DRRT), respectively. Using TAIEX index as data set, our experiments showed S-DRRT approximates DRRT well when the length of given period is one month. We then score each equity fund by the cumulative distribution function of S-DRRT i.e., s(m; DRRT) = Pr [R-rt <= R (m)], where R (m) denotes the return of the equity fund m during the given period. Using the historical data on equity funds in Taiwan, we observed interesting characteristics. When analyzing monthly returns, although there are some winners who are able to achieve scores higher than : 9 sometimes, it is difficult for them to always keep up at the high scores. However, few equity funds showed the stability of scores higher than : 7, when analyzing long-term returns. Furthermore, there are times when most funds obtain high scores. There are also times when no funds perform well.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 761
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMP INT FIN ENG EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], J FINANCE
[3]   Option trading and individual investor performance [J].
Bauer, Rob ;
Cosemans, Mathijs ;
Eichholtz, Piet .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2009, 33 (04) :731-746
[4]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[5]  
Butler M., 2012, COMP INT FIN ENG EC
[6]   Career concerns of mutual fund managers [J].
Chevalier, J ;
Ellison, G .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (02) :389-432
[7]   Are some mutual fund managers better than others? cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance [J].
Chevalier, J ;
Ellison, G .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1999, 54 (03) :875-899
[8]  
Christopherson J., 1997, REV FINANCIAL STUDIE, V11
[9]   The Market Timing Ability of UK Mutual Funds [J].
Cuthbertson, Keith ;
Nitzsche, Dirk ;
O'Sullivan, Niall .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2010, 37 (1-2) :270-289
[10]   Time log-normal approximation in financial and other computations [J].
Dufresne, D .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2004, 36 (03) :747-773