Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity

被引:91
作者
Harenski, Carla L. [1 ]
Antonenko, Olga [2 ]
Shane, Matthew S. [1 ]
Kiehl, Kent A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mind Res Network, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Psychol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsn026
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Researchers have proposed that females and males differ in the structure of their moral attitudes, such that females tend to adopt care-based moral evaluations and males tend to adopt justice-based moral evaluations. The existence of these gender differences remains a controversial issue, as behavioral studies have reported mixed findings. The current study investigated the neural correlates of moral sensitivity in females and males, to test the hypothesis that females would show increased activity in brain regions associated with care-based processing (posterior and anterior cingulate, anterior insula) relative to males when evaluating moral stimuli, and males would show increased activity in regions associated with justice-based processing (superior temporal sulcus) relative to females. Twenty-eight participants (14 females) were scanned using fMRI while viewing unpleasant pictures, half of which depicted moral violations, and rated each picture on the degree of moral violation that they judged to be present. As predicted, females showed a stronger modulatory relationship between posterior cingulate and insula activity during picture viewing and subsequent moral ratings relative to males. Males showed a stronger modulatory relationship between inferior parietal activity and moral ratings relative to females. These results are suggestive of gender differences in strategies utilized in moral appraisals.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 321
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation [J].
Borg, Jana Schaich ;
Hynes, Catherine ;
Van Horn, John ;
Grafton, Scott ;
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (05) :803-817
[2]   Viewing facial expressions of pain engages cortical areas involved in the direct experience of pain [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Jha, AP ;
Bylsma, LM ;
Fabian, SA ;
Solomon, PE ;
Prkachin, KM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 25 (01) :312-319
[3]   Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: Scientific evidence and ethical considerations [J].
Canli, T ;
Amin, Z .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2002, 50 (03) :414-431
[4]   Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions [J].
Damasio, AR ;
Grabowski, TJ ;
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, H ;
Ponto, LLB ;
Parvizi, J ;
Hichwa, RD .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (10) :1049-1056
[5]   Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience [J].
Decety, Jean ;
Lamm, Claus .
THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2006, 6 :1146-1163
[6]  
Fink GR, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P4275
[7]   IN A DIFFERENT VOICE - WOMENS CONCEPTIONS OF SELF AND OF MORALITY [J].
GILLIGAN, C .
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1977, 47 (04) :481-517
[8]   How (and where) does moral judgment work? [J].
Greene, J ;
Haidt, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (12) :517-523
[9]   The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment [J].
Greene, JD ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Engell, AD ;
Darley, JM ;
Cohen, JD .
NEURON, 2004, 44 (02) :389-400
[10]   An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment [J].
Greene, JD ;
Sommerville, RB ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Darley, JM ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5537) :2105-2108