Does "birds of a feather flock together" matter-Evidence from a longitudinal study on US-China scientific collaboration

被引:47
作者
Tang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Research evaluation; International collaboration; Panel regression; CO-AUTHORSHIP; NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH; CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE POLICY; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; NANOSCIENCE; COOPERATION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.010
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
China's status as a scientific power, particularly in the emerging area of nanotechnology, has become widely accepted in the global scientific community. The role of knowledge spillover in China's nanotechnology development is generally assumed, albeit without much convincing evidence. Very little has been investigated on the different mechanisms of knowledge spillover. Utilizing both cross-sectional data and longitudinal data of 77 Chinese nanoscientists' publications, this study aims to differentiate individual effects from the effect of international collaboration on the research performance of Chinese researchers. The study finds evidence in support of the "birds of a feather flock together" argument - that China's best scientists collaborate at international level. It also finds that collaboration across national boundaries has a consistently positive effect on China's nano research quality with a time-decaying pattern. Language turns out to be the most influential factor impacting the quality or visibility of Chinese nano research. Policy implications on research evaluation, human capital management, and public research and development allocation are also discussed in the end. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 344
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures
    Abbasi, Alireza
    Altmann, Joern
    Hossain, Liaquat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (04) : 594 - 607
  • [2] National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 86 (02) : 347 - 364
  • [3] Adams J., 2006, NEW GEOGRAPHY SCI UK
  • [4] Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999
    Adams, JD
    Black, GC
    Clemmons, JR
    Stephan, PE
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) : 259 - 285
  • [5] PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENCES AMONG SCIENTISTS - EVIDENCE FOR ACCUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE
    ALLISON, PD
    STEWART, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 39 (04) : 596 - 606
  • [6] [Anonymous], SCI PUBLIC POLICY, DOI [10.3152/030234208x319366, DOI 10.3152/030234208X319366]
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
  • [8] Developmental state and innovation: nanotechnology in China
    Appelbaum, Richard P.
    Parker, Rachel
    Cao, Cong
    [J]. GLOBAL NETWORKS-A JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2011, 11 (03): : 298 - 314
  • [9] INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION IN SCIENCE - PARTICIPATION BY THE ASIAN GIANTS
    ARUNACHALAM, S
    SRINIVASAN, R
    RAMAN, V
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 1994, 30 (01) : 7 - 22
  • [10] Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model
    Baldi, S
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 63 (06) : 829 - 846