Modelling exposure of workers, residents and bystanders to vapour of plant protection products after application to crops

被引:16
作者
van den Berg, F. [1 ]
Jacobs, C. M. J. [1 ]
Ellis, M. C. Butler [2 ]
Spanoghe, P. [3 ]
Ngoc, K. Doan [3 ]
Fragkoulis, G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Alterra Wageningen LIR, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Silsoe Spray Applicat Unit, Silsoe, Beds, England
[3] Univ Ghent, Lab Crop Protect Chem, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ist Chim Agr & Ambientale, Piacenza, Italy
关键词
Pesticide volatilisation; Vapour exposure; OPS; Modelling; Scenario development; PEARL; VOLATILIZATION; PESTICIDES; DISPERSION; CHLOROTHALONIL; FENPROPIMORPH; PENETRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.180
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural use of plant protection products can result in exposure of bystanders, residents, operators and workers. Within the European Union (EU) FP7 project BROWSE, a tool based on a set of models and scenarios has been developed, aiming to assess the risk of exposure of humans to these products. In the present version of the tool only a first conservative tier is available for outdoor vapour exposure assessment. In the vapour exposure evaluation, the target concentrations in air at 10 m distance from the edge of a treated field are calculated for specific scenarios for each EU regulatory zone. These scenarios have been selected to represent reasonable worst case volatilisation conditions. The exposure assessment is based on a series of weekly applications in a five year period to cover a wide range of meteorological conditions. The volatilisation from the crop is calculated using the PEARL model and this PEARL output provides the emission strength used as input for the short term version of the atmospheric transport model OPS. The combined PEARL-OPS model is tested against measurements from a field experiment. First results of this test show that the mean concentration level was predicted fairly well. However, sometimes the differences between observations and simulations were found to be substantial. Improvements are suggested for the vapour exposure scenarios as well as for further model development. In the current version of the BROWSE tool a simplified procedure is used to assess single and multiple applications. The actual period of application and the time of application during the day are fixed, and the growth stage of the crop cannot be taken into account Moreover, competing processes such as penetration of the substance into the plant tissue are not considered. The effect of these factors on the target exposure concentrations is discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1020
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SANCO131442010 FOCUS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DESCRIPTION USERS GU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Soil Atlas of Europe, P128
[4]  
Asman W., 2003, DRY DEPOSITION SPRAY, P2003
[5]  
Baldocchi D, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P2415, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Mass transfer of pesticides into the atmosphere by volatilization from soils and plants: overview [J].
Bedos, C ;
Cellier, P ;
Calvet, R ;
Barriuso, E ;
Gabrielle, B .
AGRONOMIE, 2002, 22 (01) :21-33
[8]   Gaseous Deposition Contributes to the Contamination of Surface Waters by Pesticides Close to Treated Fields. A Process-Based Model Study [J].
Bedos, Carole ;
Loubet, Benjamin ;
Barriuso, Enrique .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (24) :14250-14257
[9]   Fungicide Volatilization Measurements: Inverse Modeling, Role of Vapor Pressure, and State of Foliar Residue [J].
Bedos, Carole ;
Rousseau-Djabri, Marie-France ;
Loubet, Benjamin ;
Durand, Brigitte ;
Flura, Dominique ;
Briand, Olivier ;
Barriuso, Enrique .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (07) :2522-2528
[10]  
Berg F. van den, 2006, Aspects of Applied Biology, P197