A method for automatic estimation of instantaneous local uncertainty in particle image velocimetry measurements

被引:117
作者
Timmins, Benjamin H. [1 ]
Wilson, Brandon W. [1 ]
Smith, Barton L. [1 ]
Vlachos, Pavlos P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Mech Engn, Blacksburg, VA USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
PIV;
D O I
10.1007/s00348-012-1341-1
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The uncertainty of any measurement is the interval in which one believes the actual error lies. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurement error depends on the PIV algorithm used, a wide range of user inputs, flow characteristics, and the experimental setup. Since these factors vary in time and space, they lead to nonuniform error throughout the flow field. As such, a universal PIV uncertainty estimate is not adequate and can be misleading. This is of particular interest when PIV data are used for comparison with computational or experimental data. A method to estimate the uncertainty from sources detectable in the raw images and due to the PIV calculation of each individual velocity measurement is presented. The relationship between four error sources and their contribution to PIV error is first determined. The sources, or parameters, considered are particle image diameter, particle density, particle displacement, and velocity gradient, although this choice in parameters is arbitrary and may not be complete. This information provides a four-dimensional "uncertainty surface" specific to the PIV algorithm used. After PIV processing, our code "measures" the value of each of these parameters and estimates the velocity uncertainty due to the PIV algorithm for each vector in the flow field. The reliability of our methodology is validated using known flow fields so the actual error can be determined. Our analysis shows that, for most flows, the uncertainty distribution obtained using this method fits the confidence interval. An experiment is used to show that systematic uncertainties are accurately computed for a jet flow. The method is general and can be adapted to any PIV analysis, provided that the relevant error sources can be identified for a given experiment and the appropriate parameters can be quantified from the images obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1147
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Adrian R.J., 2011, Particle Image Velocimetry, VI
[2]   Twenty years of particle image velocimetry [J].
Adrian, RJ .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2005, 39 (02) :159-169
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PIV UNC WORKSH
[4]  
ASME, 2009, STAND VER VAL COMP F
[5]  
Coleman H. W., 2009, Uncertainty analysis for uncertainty analysis for engineers, VThird
[6]   Digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) robust phase correlation [J].
Eckstein, Adric ;
Vlachos, Pavlos P. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 20 (05)
[7]   Assessment of advanced windowing techniques for digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) [J].
Eckstein, Adric ;
Vlachos, Pavlos P. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 20 (07)
[8]   Phase correlation processing for DPIV measurements [J].
Eckstein, Adric C. ;
Charonko, John ;
Vlachos, Pavlos .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2008, 45 (03) :485-500
[9]   A correlation-based continuous window-shift technique to reduce the peak-locking effect in digital PIV image evaluation [J].
Gui, L ;
Wereley, ST .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2002, 32 (04) :506-517
[10]   THEORY OF CROSS-CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF PIV IMAGES [J].
KEANE, RD ;
ADRIAN, RJ .
APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1992, 49 (03) :191-215