Multifocal contact lens vision simulated with a clinical binocular simulator

被引:5
作者
Barcala, Xoana [1 ,2 ]
Vinas, Maria [1 ,3 ]
Ruiz, Sofia [4 ]
Hidalgo, Fernando [4 ]
Nankivil, Derek [5 ]
Karkkainen, Tom [6 ]
Gambra, Enrique [2 ]
Dorronsoro, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Marcos, Susana [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, IO, Spanish Natl Res Council, Inst Opt, Madrid, Spain
[2] 2EyesVis SL, Madrid, Spain
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Wellman Ctr Photomed, Boston, MA USA
[4] Ctr Boston Optometria, Madrid, Spain
[5] Johnson & Johnson Vis Care Inc, Design Ctr Excellence Res & Dev, Jacksonville, FL USA
[6] Johnson & Johnson Vis Care Inc, Clin Sci Res & Dev, Jacksonville, FL USA
[7] Univ Rochester, Inst Opt, Flaum Eye Inst, Ctr Visual Sci, Rochester, NY USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Presbyopia; Multifocal soft contact lenses; Binocular simultaneous vision simulator; Questionnaire; Quality of vision; Multifocal vision evaluation; INTERNATIONAL SURVEY; VISUAL PERFORMANCE; ADAPTIVE OPTICS; ACUITY; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2022.101716
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the binocular visual perception of participants wearing multifocal contact lenses and these same lens designs viewed through a temporal multiplexing visual simulator.Methods: Visual performance and perceived visual quality at various distances were obtained in 37 participants wearing soft M-CLs and through the SimVis Gekko programmed with the same lenses. In a pilot study (n = 10) visual performance was measured in terms of LogMAR visual acuity (VA) at far (4 m), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) distances and through-focus VA (TFVA) curves with the simulated M-CLs. In the follow-up study (n = 27), LogMAR VA at far, intermediate and near distances were measured both with the actual and simulated M-CLs. Perceived visual quality was measured in both studies using the Multifocal Acceptance Score (MAS-2EV), and a Participants Reported Outcomes Vision questionnaire. Differences between the metrics obtained with simulated and actual lenses were obtained.Results: Both actual and simulated M-CLs increased depth-of-focus by a similar amount. Mean LogMAR VA differences with actual and simulated M-CLs ranged between 4 and 6 letters (0.08 +/- 0.01, 0.12 +/- 0.01 and 0.10 +/- 0.01, for far, intermediate and near distances, respectively). MAS-2EV average score differences with actual and simulated M-CLs ranged between-1.00 and + 4.25. Average MAS-2EV scores were not correlated significantly with VA. However, MAS-2EV (average and individual scores) were highly correlated to visual quality questionnaire responses (p < 0.005).Conclusions: A simultaneous vision simulator accurately represented vision with M-CLs both VA at various distances and perceived visual quality, as measured in a clinical setting. The MAS-2EV metric accurately captured participant reported outcomes of standard vision questionnaires. The combination of SimVis Gekko and MAS-2EV has the potential to largely reduce chair time in M-CLs fitting.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Experimental validations of a tunable-lens-based visual demonstrator of multifocal corrections [J].
Akondi, Vyas ;
Sawides, Lucie ;
Marrakchi, Yassine ;
Gambra, Enrique ;
Marcos, Susana ;
Dorronsoro, Carlos .
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2018, 9 (12) :6302-6317
[2]   Temporal multiplexing to simulate multifocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations [J].
Akondi, Vyas ;
Dorronsoro, Carlos ;
Gambra, Enrique ;
Marcos, Susana .
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2017, 8 (07) :3410-3425
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 1-Day Acuvue Moist Brand Contact Lenses Package Insert Fitting Guide, P1
[4]   Multifocal acceptance score to evaluate vision: MAS-2EV [J].
Barcala, Xoana ;
Vinas, Maria ;
Romero, Mercedes ;
Gambra, Enrique ;
Luis Mendez-Gonzalez, Juan ;
Marcos, Susana ;
Dorronsoro, Carlos .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[5]   Objective analysis of contact lens fit [J].
Belda-Salmeron, Lurdes ;
Drew, Tom ;
Hall, Lee ;
Wolffsohn, James Stuart .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2015, 38 (03) :163-167
[6]   Contact lens correction of presbyopia [J].
Bennett, Edward S. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2008, 91 (03) :265-278
[7]   Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches [J].
Charman, W. Neil .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (04) :397-426
[8]  
Ciuffreda K.J., 1998, Borish's clinical refraction, P77
[9]  
College of Optometrists and The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, CONT LENS FITT 2011
[10]   Optical considerations in the contact lens correction of infant aphakia [J].
Collins, MJ ;
Franklin, R ;
Davis, BA .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (04) :234-240