Decentralization and Primary Health Care Innovations in Indonesia

被引:5
作者
Miharti, Suwatin [1 ,2 ]
Holzhacker, Ronald L. [1 ]
Wittek, Rafael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Int Relat & Int Org, Fac Arts, Oude Kijk Jatstr 26, NL-9712 EK Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, Fac Behav & Social Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
DECENTRALIZATION AND GOVERNANCE IN INDONESIA | 2016年 / 2卷
关键词
Primary health care; Decentralization; Local government; Innovation; Decision space; Accountability mechanism; Organizational capacity; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; DECISION SPACE; COUNTRIES; SYSTEMS; ACCOUNTABILITY; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-22434-3_3
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A well-functioning primary health care system (PHCS) is fundamental for a nation's overall health performance. PHCSs are designed to improve universal access to health care, which likely leads to healthier communities, higher quality of care, and a more effective and efficient health care system. The present chapter investigates how the two large-scale decentralization waves in Indonesia affected the processes, product and structural innovations in its PHCS. We argue that adequate organizational capacity and local level innovations are a major requirement to improve the performance of a PHCS. The study uses the decision space approach (DSA) to analyse the impact of decentralization on the decision space, accountability mechanisms and organizational capacity to facilitate health improvement. To achieve the aim, first, the study uses institutional analysis to describe the transformation of the decision space and accountability mechanism from the first and second waves of decentralization based on changes to laws and regulations. Second, the study investigates the sequence of innovation of PHCS by analysing studies on cases of innovation in the two waves of decentralization. The study found that the first wave of decentralization in Indonesia resulted in institutional changes that were detrimental to innovation. Whereas discretion for local-level decision makers increased compared to the situation under the former centralized system, requirements for accountability did not. This pattern was reversed during the second wave of decentralization, suggesting that the conditions for innovation have improved. The cases of successful innovation share a specific combination of initiative, commitment and social capital of a key decision maker as a fundamental enabler of innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 78
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Anggraini E, 2013, KEBIJAKAN MANAJEMEN, V2, P71
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OXFORD HDB ANAL SOCI
[3]  
Arrow KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P141
[4]   Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes [J].
Black, Julia .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2008, 2 (02) :137-164
[5]   Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: Decision space, innovation and performance [J].
Bossert, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 47 (10) :1513-1527
[6]   Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: Decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan [J].
Bossert, Thomas John ;
Mitchell, Andrew David .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2011, 72 (01) :39-48
[7]   Analysing the impact of fiscal decentralization on health outcomes: empirical evidence from Spain [J].
Cantarero, D. ;
Pascual, Marta .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 15 (02) :109-111
[8]  
Cheema D., 2007, DECENTRALIZING GOVER
[9]  
Dwicaksono A., 2012, JAMINAN KESEHATAN NA
[10]   Determinants of innovation within health care organizations - Literature review and Delphi study [J].
Fleuren, M ;
Wiefferink, K ;
Paulussen, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 16 (02) :107-123