Multifidelity Optimization of Hybrid Wing-Body Aircraft with Stability and Control Requirements

被引:27
作者
Reist, Thomas A. [1 ]
Zingg, David W. [2 ,3 ]
Rakowitz, Mark [4 ]
Potter, Graham [4 ]
Banetjee, Sid [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Aerosp Studies, Toronto, ON M3H 5T6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Computat Aerodynam & Sustainable Aviat, Toronto, ON M3H 5T6, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Ctr Res Sustainable Aviat, Inst Aerosp Studies, Toronto, ON M3H 5T6, Canada
[4] Bombardier Aerosp, Adv Design Prod Dev Engn, St Laurent, PQ H4S 2A9, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2019年 / 56卷 / 02期
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; SOLVER;
D O I
10.2514/1.C034703
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Methods of satisfying the stability and control (S&C) requirements for hybrid wing-body (HWB) aircraft are investigated using a multifidelity multidisciplinary optimization framework. A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver is used for aerodynamic prediction, together with conceptual-level weight and balance models. These are coupled with a gradient-based optimizer to form a multidisciplinary optimization tool. Two HWB configurations are investigated. The first uses winglets with winglet-mounted rudders for lateral control, whereas the second uses centerbody-mounted fins with rudders. Longitudinal control is achieved with one centerbody elevator and six wing-mounted elevons. The designs are optimized for a combination of minimum/maximum takeoff weight and cruise drag. The ability of the designs to maintain lateral trim with one engine inoperative at a specified minimum control speed and to achieve a given rotational acceleration at a specified rotation speed forms the off-design S&C constraints. Additional constraints at cruise ensure trim and a required static margin. In addition to a classical HWB shape, a narrower cabin layout is also considered, which provides an improved performance. The required S&C requirements are found to be attainable using both configurations, with the fin-based control having a small performance advantage. The narrow-centerbody configuration is found to provide superior performance over the classical configuration.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 456
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Abbot I. H., 1945, 824 NACA TR
[2]  
Bradley K. R., 2004, NASA CR-2004-213016
[3]   Multimodality and Global Optimization in Aerodynamic Design [J].
Chernukhin, Oleg ;
Zingg, David W. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (06) :1342-1354
[4]   The longitudinal flying qualities of a blended-wing-body civil transport aircraft [J].
Cook, MV ;
de Castro, HV .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 108 (1080) :75-84
[5]   Two-Level Free-Form and Axial Deformation for Exploratory Aerodynamic Shape Optimization [J].
Gagnon, Hugo ;
Zingg, David W. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (07) :2015-2026
[6]   Multidisciplinary Approach to Assessing Actuation Power of a Hybrid Wing-Body [J].
Garmendia, Daniel C. ;
Chakraborty, Imon ;
Mavris, Dimitri N. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2016, 53 (04) :900-913
[7]   Method for Evaluating Electrically Actuated Hybrid Wing-Body Control Surface Layouts [J].
Garmendia, Daniel C. ;
Chakraborty, Imon ;
Mavris, Dimitri N. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (06) :1780-1790
[8]   SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization (Reprinted from SIAM Journal Optimization, vol 12, pg 979-1006, 2002) [J].
Gill, PE ;
Murray, W ;
Saunders, MA .
SIAM REVIEW, 2005, 47 (01) :99-131
[9]   Parallel Newton-Krylov Solver for the Euler Equations Discretized Using Simultaneous-Approximation Terms [J].
Hicken, Jason E. ;
Zingg, David W. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (11) :2773-2786
[10]   A SIMPLIFIED AND FLEXIBLE VARIANT OF GCROT FOR SOLVING NONSYMMETRIC LINEAR SYSTEMS [J].
Hicken, Jason E. ;
Zingg, David W. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2010, 32 (03) :1672-1694