Minimally invasive treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistula: a transanal endoscopic surgery study

被引:6
作者
Yuan, Xiaoqi [1 ]
Chen, Hong [1 ]
Chen, Chunqiu [1 ]
Yang, Muqing [1 ]
Li, Qiwei [1 ]
Gao, Renyuan [1 ]
Wu, Xiaocai [1 ]
Xu, Weiwei [1 ]
Sun, Jing [1 ]
Yin, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Ctr Difficult & Complicated Abdominal Surg, Sch Med, Yanchang Rd 301, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 34卷 / 09期
关键词
Rectovaginal fistula (RVF); Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES); Rectal mucosal advancement flap (RMAF); MANAGEMENT; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-019-07174-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) is extremely difficult. No standard surgical procedure is accepted worldwide. The aim of this article was to evaluate a minimally invasive procedure for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistula. Methods This is a retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas (located in the lower or middle one-third of the vaginal wall) at our center between August 2016 and October 2018. The anal approach was adopted for 12 patients: 6 patients were treated directly by rectal mucosal advancement flap (RMAF) with transanal endoscopic surgery (TES), while the other 6 patients underwent initial TES exploration followed by RMAF procedure under direct vision. The vaginal approach was adopted for 5 patients: 3 patients were treated under TES directly and the other 2 were treated under direct vision after initial TES exploration. A total of 9 (52.94%) patients received diverting ileostomy-5 anal approach patients and 4 vaginal approach patients. Results Median age of the patients was 46 years (range 10-76 years), and median BMI was 21.9 (range 17.9-28.1). Median operative time was 75 min (range 60-120 min), and median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 6-15 days). Recurrence was seen in 3/12 anal approach patients vs. 0/5 vaginal approach patients. Both the median preoperative and the median postoperative Wexner score were 0 (range 0-2). The median follow-up time was 8 months (range 2-24). No severe complications occurred in any patient. Conclusion The TES procedure for the treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas avoids any incision of the abdomen and perineal area and appears to be a safe and feasible procedure. This minimally invasive technique is still evolving and is likely to gain wide acceptance in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:3971 / 3977
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Repair of a recurrent rectovaginal fistula with a biological graft
    Berger, Kate
    Faro, Jonathan
    Faro, Sebastian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (07) : 1071 - 1073
  • [2] BUESS G, 1983, LEBER MAGEN DARM, V13, P73
  • [3] Successful repair of recurrent rectovaginal fistula by stratified suture using transanal endoscopic microsurgery: A CARE-compliant case report
    Chen, Weijie
    Chen, Xin
    Lin, Guole
    Qiu, Huizhong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (36)
  • [4] Rectovaginal Fistula: What Is the Optimal Strategy? An Analysis of 79 Patients Undergoing 286 Procedures
    Corte, Helene
    Maggiori, Leon
    Treton, Xavier
    Lefevre, Jeremie H.
    Ferron, Marianne
    Panis, Yves
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (05) : 855 - 861
  • [5] Minimally invasive treatment of rectovaginal fistula
    D'Ambrosio, Giancarlo
    Paganini, Alessandro M.
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Barchetti, Luciana
    Lezoche, Giovanni
    Fabiani, Bernardina
    Lezoche, Emanuele
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (02): : 546 - 550
  • [6] MR Imaging Evaluation of Perianal Fistulas: Spectrum of Imaging Features
    de Miguel Criado, Jaime
    Garcia del Salto, Laura
    Fraga Rivas, Patricia
    Felipe Aguilera del Hoyo, Luis
    Gutierrez Velasco, Leticia
    Diez Perez de las Vacas, M. Isabel
    Marco Sanz, Ana G.
    Manzano Paradela, Marcos
    Fraile Moreno, Eduardo
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2012, 32 (01) : 175 - 194
  • [7] Debeche-Adams Teresa H, 2010, Clin Colon Rectal Surg, V23, P99, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1254296
  • [8] Single-Port Access Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Novel Method with a Wound Retractor and a Glove
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Kim, Chul Jung
    Kang, Heeseok
    Choi, Chel Hun
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Lee, Je-Ho
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (04) : 450 - 453
  • [9] Primary repair of rectovaginal fistulas complicating pelvic surgery by gracilis myocutaneous flap
    Nassar, Omaya A. H.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (03) : 610 - 614
  • [10] Practice Patterns Regarding Management of Rectovaginal Fistulae: A Multicenter Review From the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network
    Oakley, Susan H.
    Brown, Heidi W.
    Yurteri-Kaplan, Ladin
    Greer, Joy A.
    Richardson, Monica L.
    Adelowo, Amos
    Lindo, Fiona M.
    Greene, Kristie A.
    Fok, Cynthia S.
    Book, Nicole M.
    Saiz, Cristina M.
    Plowright, Leon N.
    Harvie, Heidi S.
    Pauls, Rachel N.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 21 (03): : 123 - 128