Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Analogues in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

被引:14
作者
Shafie, Asrul Akmal [1 ]
Ng, Chin Hui [1 ]
Tan, Yui Ping [1 ]
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Discipline Social & Adm Pharm, George Town 11800, Malaysia
[2] Monash Univ Malaysia, Sch Pharm, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Naresuan Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, Ctr Pharmaceut Outcomes Res, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
NEUTRAL PROTAMINE HAGEDORN; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN; HEALTH ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; NPH INSULIN; ASPART; 30; THERAPY CONVERSION; PREMIXED INSULIN; IDDM PATIENTS; ORAL-AGENTS; GLARGINE;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-016-0456-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background Insulin analogues have a pharmacokinetic advantage over human insulin and are increasingly used to treat diabetes mellitus. A summary of their cost effectiveness versus other available treatments was required. Objective Our objective was to systematically review the published cost-effectiveness studies of insulin analogues for the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We searched major databases and health technology assessment agency reports for economic evaluation studies published up until 30 September 2015. Two reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the quality of the data using the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) guidelines. Results Seven of the included studies assessed short-acting insulin analogues, 12 assessed biphasic insulin analogues, 30 assessed long-acting insulin analogues and one assessed a combination of short- and long-acting insulin analogues. Only 17 studies involved patients with T1DM, all were modelling studies and 12 were conducted in Canada. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for short-acting insulin analogues ranged from dominant to $US435,913 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, the ICERs for biphasic insulin analogues ranged from dominant to $US57,636 per QALY gained and the ICERs for long-acting insulin analogues ranged from dominant to $US599,863 per QALY gained. A total of 15 studies met all the CHEERS guidelines reporting quality criteria. Only 26 % of the studies assessed heterogeneity in their analyses. Conclusion Current evidence indicates that insulin analogues are cost effective for T1DM; however, evidence for their use in T2DM is not convincing. Additional evidence regarding compliance and efficacy is required to support the broader use of long-acting and biphasic insulin analogues in T2DM. The value of insulin analogues depends strongly on reductions in hypoglycaemia event rates and its efficacy in lowering glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)).
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 162
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Approaches to Glycemic Treatment
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 : S41 - S48
  • [2] Reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and frequency of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients on insulin-analog treatment
    Anderson, JH
    Brunelle, RL
    Koivisto, VA
    Pfutzner, A
    Trautmann, ME
    Vignati, L
    DiMarchi, R
    Bowen, KM
    Cameron, DP
    Nankervis, AJ
    Roberts, AP
    Zimmet, P
    Borkenstein, MH
    Schernthaner, G
    Waldhausl, WK
    DeLeeuw, IH
    Fery, F
    Scheen, A
    Somers, G
    Fettes, IM
    Tildesley, HD
    Toth, EL
    Viikari, J
    Altman, JJ
    Bougneres, PF
    Drouin, P
    Fossati, P
    Guillausseau, PJ
    Marechaud, E
    Riou, JP
    Selam, JL
    Vialettes, PB
    Beyer, J
    Federlin, K
    Fussganger, RD
    Gries, FA
    Jastram, HU
    Koop, I
    Landgraf, R
    Rosak, C
    Schatz, H
    SchulzeSchleppinghoff, B
    Seif, FJ
    Stoeckmann, F
    Karasik, A
    Weitzman, S
    Andreani, D
    Bompiani, G
    Crepaldi, G
    Giorgino, R
    [J]. DIABETES, 1997, 46 (02) : 265 - 270
  • [3] [Anonymous], CLIN PRACT GUID MAN
  • [4] [Anonymous], J MED EC S
  • [5] [Anonymous], NICE GUID TYP 1 DIAB
  • [6] [Anonymous], MED CTR DIAB
  • [7] Beaudet Amelie, 2011, J Med Econ, V14, P357, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2011.579213
  • [8] Insulin analogues and their potential in the management of diabetes mellitus
    Bolli, GB
    Di Marchi, RD
    Park, GD
    Pramming, S
    Koivisto, VA
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1999, 42 (10) : 1151 - 1167
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, modeling the interaction between hypoglycemia and glycemic control in Switzerland
    Braendie, M.
    Azoulay, M.
    Greiner, R. -A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 49 (03) : 217 - 230
  • [10] Brändle M, 2007, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V45, P203