Evaluation of generic types of drilling fluid using a risk-based analytic hierarchy process

被引:27
作者
Sadiq, R [1 ]
Husain, T
Veitch, B
Bose, N
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Inst Res Construct, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, St Johns, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
drilling fluid; analytic hierarchy process; weighting scheme; decision-making;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-003-0009-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The composition of drilling muds is based on a mixture of clays and additives in a base fluid. There are three generic categories of base fluid - water, oil, and synthetic. Water-based fluids (WBFs) are relatively environmentally benign, but drilling performance is better with oil-based fluids (OBFs). The oil and gas industry developed synthetic-based fluids (SBFs), such as vegetable esters, olefins, ethers, and others, which provide drilling performance comparable to OBFs, but with lower environmental and occupational health effects. The primary objective of this paper is to present a methodology to guide decision-making in the selection and evaluation of three generic types of drilling fluids using a risk-based analytic hierarchy process (AHIP). In this paper a comparison of drilling fluids is made considering various activities involved in the life cycle of drilling fluids. This paper evaluates OBFs, WBFs, and SBFs based on four major impacts - operations, resources, economics, and liabilities. Four major activities - drilling, discharging offshore, loading and transporting, and disposing onshore-cause the operational impacts. Each activity involves risks related to occupational injuries (safety), general public health, environmental impact, and energy use. A multicriteria analysis strategy was used for the selection and evaluation of drilling fluids using a risk-based AHIP. A four-level hierarchical structure is developed to determine the final relative scores, and the SBFs are found to be the best option.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 787
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] DEY PK, 2002, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V22, P703, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00020-3
  • [2] Golden B.L., 1989, APPL ANAL HIERARCHY
  • [3] HALL J, 2000, OFFSHORE, V59, P129
  • [4] Hwang C.L., 1981, METHODS MULTIPLE ATT, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3]
  • [5] Lin M.J., 1987, Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications
  • [6] MEINHOLD AF, 1998, BNL66108 US DEP EN N
  • [7] Saaty T.L., 1988, MULTICRITERIA DECISI
  • [8] Saaty TL., 1996, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process
  • [9] SAATY TL, 2001, MODELS METHODS CONCE, pCH1
  • [10] Sadiq R., 2001, THESIS MEMORIAL U NE