Pedicular vascular control in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: The use of clips instead of stapler in 341 donors

被引:14
作者
Simforoosh, N [1 ]
Basiri, A [1 ]
Tabibi, A [1 ]
Fattahi, MR [1 ]
Semnani, MN [1 ]
Mahdavi, KN [1 ]
Majdpour, HS [1 ]
Behjati, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaheed Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Kidney Transplantat, Shaheed Labbafinejad Med Ctr, Urol & Nephrol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.013
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Purpose. To demonstrate a less expensive approach for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Materials and methods. Left donor nephrectomy was done transperitoneally in flank position. Renal vein and artery were exposed and prepared for nephrectomy. Nondisposable trocars and instruments were used. The adrenal vein was clipped and its arteries were bipolar coagulated. Both renal artery and vein were clip-ligated using three medium large nonautomatic metallic clips and divided, instead of using rather expensive vascular endostapler. Kidney was hand-extracted from suprapubic incision (no Endobag was used). Results. Donor nephrectomy was performed in 341 donors. Mean warm ischemia time was 8.17 minutes. Mean operative time was 260.3 minutes. Conversion and reoperation was required in 2.1% and 3.8% of donors, respectively. Ureteral complications were observed in 2.1% of recipients. No vascular accident occurred from pedicular vessels. One-year graft survival in recipients was 92.6%. By this approach, at least $600 was saved in each nephrectomy. Conclusion. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy can be performed with a less expensive setup without adverse effects on graft outcome. Vascular control using nonautomatic clips instead of more costly vascular endostapler and also hand extraction of the kidney is safe, practical, and economical.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 391
页数:2
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Cadeddu J A, 2000, Semin Laparosc Surg, V7, P195, DOI 10.1053/slas.2000.5593
[2]   Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: Early recognition and management [J].
Chan, D ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Ratner, L ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Jarrett, TW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) :319-321
[3]   Looped silk tie: surgical technique for management of the renal vein during laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy [J].
Chon, CH ;
Chung, SY ;
Ng, CS ;
Fuchs, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) :401-405
[4]   Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure [J].
Deng, DY ;
Meng, MV ;
Nguyen, HT ;
Bellman, GC ;
Stoller, ML .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (03) :415-419
[5]   LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE-DONOR NEPHRECTOMY [J].
GILL, IS ;
CARBONE, JM ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
FADDEN, PA ;
STONE, AM ;
LUCAS, BA ;
MCROBERTS, JW .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1994, 8 (02) :143-148
[6]   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6-year experience [J].
Jacobs, SC ;
Cho, E ;
Foster, C ;
Liao, P ;
Bartlett, ST .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) :47-51
[7]   Ligation of the renal vein during laparoscopic nephrectomy: An effective and reliable method to replace vascular staplers [J].
Janetschek, G ;
Bagheri, F ;
Abdelmaksoud, A ;
Biyani, CS ;
Leeb, K ;
Jeschke, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) :1295-1297
[8]  
RATNER LE, 1995, TRANSPLANTATION, V60, P1047
[9]   Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: The first randomized clinical trial [J].
Simforoosh, N ;
Bassiri, A ;
Ziaee, SAM ;
Tabibi, A ;
Salim, NS ;
Pourrezagholi, F ;
Moghaddam, SMMH ;
Maghsoodi, R ;
Shafi, H .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (07) :2553-2554