Modeling the critical hydrogen concentration in the AECL test reactor

被引:26
作者
Bartels, David M. [1 ,2 ]
Henshaw, Jim
Sims, Howard E.
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame Radiat Lab, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Chem & Biochem, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
Nuclear reactor; Critical hydrogen concentration; Hydrogen water chemistry; Water radiolysis; Kinetics model; PULSE-RADIOLYSIS; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; SUPERCRITICAL WATER; SOLVATED ELECTRON; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; YIELDS; RECOMBINATION; DECOMPOSITION; DEPENDENCES; SCAVENGER;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.09.012
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen is added to a pressurized water reactor (PWR) to suppress radiolysis and maintain reducing conditions. The minimum hydrogen concentration needed to prevent radiolysis is referred to as the critical hydrogen concentration (CHC). The CHC was measured experimentally in the mid-1990s by Elliot and Stuart in a reactor loop at Atomic Energy of Canada (AECL), and was found to be approximately 0.5 scc/kg for typical PWR conditions. This value is well below industry-normal PWR operating levels near 40 scc/kg. Radiation chemistry models have also predicted a low CHC, even below the AECL experimental result. In the last few years some of the radiation chemical kinetic rate constants have been re-measured and G-values have been reassessed by Elliot and Bartels. These new data have been used in this work to revise the models and compare them with AECL experimental data. It is quite clear that the scavenging yields tabulated for high-LET radiolysis by Elliot and Bartels are not appropriate to use in the present context, where track-escape yields are needed to describe the homogeneous recombination kinetics in the mixed radiation field. In the absence of such data for high temperature PWR conditions, we have used the neutron G-values as fitting parameters. Even with this expedient, the model predicts at least a factor of two smaller CHC than was observed. We demonstrate that to recover the reported CHC result, the chemistry of ammonia impurity must be included. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
aElliot A. J., 2008, 153127160440003 AECL
[2]  
Bartels D.M., 2012, RAD PHYS CHEM UNPUB
[3]   Comment on the possible role of the reaction H•+H2O→H2+•OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures [J].
Bartels, David M. .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2009, 78 (03) :191-194
[4]   Spur decay of the solvated electron in picosecond radiolysis measured with time-correlated absorption spectroscopy [J].
Bartels, DM ;
Cook, AR ;
Mudaliar, M ;
Jonah, CD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2000, 104 (08) :1686-1691
[5]  
Burns W.G., 1992, WATER CHEM NUCL REAC, V6
[6]  
Burns W.G., 1975, AERE2702
[7]  
Buxton G.V., 1987, RAD CHEM PRINCIPLES
[8]   Investigation of the •NH2 radical in aqueous solution up to 200°C by pulse radiolysis [J].
Buxton, GV ;
Lynch, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-FARADAY TRANSACTIONS, 1998, 94 (21) :3271-3274
[9]  
Christensen H., 1994, Proceedings of the International Conference, Chemistry in Water Reactors: Operating Experience and New Developments, P153
[10]   Pulse radiolysis of supercritical water. 1. Reactions between hydrophobic and anionic species [J].
Cline, J ;
Takahashi, K ;
Marin, TW ;
Jonah, CD ;
Bartels, DM .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2002, 106 (51) :12260-12269