Repeatability and validation of Gait Deviation Index in children: Typically developing and cerebral palsy

被引:43
作者
Massaad, Abir [1 ]
Assi, Ayman [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Skalli, Wafa [3 ]
Ghanem, Ismat [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gait & Motion Anal Lab, Sesobel, Aintoura, Lebanon
[2] Univ St Joseph, Lab Biomech, Fac Med, PTS, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Lab Biomecan, F-75013 Paris, France
[4] Hop Hotel Dieu France, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Gait analysis; Gait Deviation Index; Repeatability; Uncertainty; Cerebral palsy;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The Gait Deviation Index (GDI) is a dimensionless parameter that evaluates the deviation of kinematic gait from a control database. The GDI can be used to stratify gait pathology in children with cerebral palsy (CP). In this paper the repeatability and uncertainty of the GDI were evaluated. The Correlation between the GDI and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was studied for different groups of children with CP (hemiplegia, diplegia, triplegia and quadriplegia). Forty-nine, typically developing children (TD) formed our database. A retrospective study was conducted on our 3D gait data and clinical exams and 134 spastic children were included. Sixteen TD children completed the gait analysis twice to evaluate the repeatability of the GDI (test-retest evaluation). Monte Carlo simulations were applied for all groups (TD and children with CP) in order to evaluate the propagation of errors stemming from kinematics. The repeatability coefficient (2SD of test-retest differences), obtained on the GDI for the 16 TD children (32 lower limbs) was +/- 10. Monte Carlo simulations showed an uncertainty ranging between 0.8 and 1.3 for TD children and all groups with CP. The Spearman Rank correlation showed a moderate correlation between the GDI and the GMFCS (r = -0.44, p < 0.0001). (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 358
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT CLASS FUNCT DIS
[2]   Gait analysis in children and uncertainty assessment for Davis protocol and Gillette Gait Index [J].
Assi, Ayman ;
Ghanem, Ismat ;
Lavaste, Francois ;
Skalli, Wafa .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (01) :22-26
[3]   The Gait Profile Score and Movement Analysis Profile [J].
Baker, Richard ;
McGinley, Jennifer L. ;
Schwartz, Michael H. ;
Beynon, Sarah ;
Rozumalski, Adam ;
Graham, H. Kerr ;
Tirosh, Oren .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (03) :265-269
[4]   Tibio-femoral joint constraints for bone pose estimation during movement using multi-body optimization [J].
Bergamini, E. ;
Pillet, H. ;
Hausselle, J. ;
Thoreux, P. ;
Guerard, S. ;
Camomilla, V. ;
Cappozzo, A. ;
Skalli, W. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 33 (04) :706-711
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   A GAIT ANALYSIS DATA-COLLECTION AND REDUCTION TECHNIQUE [J].
DAVIS, RB ;
OUNPUU, S ;
TYBURSKI, D ;
GAGE, JR .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 10 (05) :575-587
[7]   Correlation of the Edinburgh Gait Score with the Gillette Gait Index, the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire, and dimensionless speed [J].
Hillman, Susan J. ;
Hazlewood, M. Elizabeth ;
Schwartz, Michael H. ;
van der Linden, Marietta L. ;
Robb, James E. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 27 (01) :7-11
[8]   Balance abilities and gait characteristics in post-traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy and typically developed children [J].
Katz-Leurer, Michal ;
Rotem, Hemda ;
Keren, Ofer ;
Meyer, Shirley .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2009, 12 (02) :100-105
[9]   Further evidence of validity of the Gait Deviation Index [J].
Molloy, M. ;
McDowell, B. C. ;
Kerr, C. ;
Cosgrove, A. P. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 31 (04) :479-482
[10]   Statistical power in testing a hypothesis [J].
Petrie, A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (09) :1192-1194