A kriging metamodel-assisted robust optimization method based on a reverse model

被引:21
作者
Zhou, Hui [1 ]
Zhou, Qi [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Congwei [4 ]
Zhou, Taotao [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Digital Mfg Equipment & Technol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, George W Woodruff Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] China Ship Dev & Design Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robust optimization; reverse model; interval uncertainty; interpolation uncertainty; kriging; SEQUENTIAL OPTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE ROBUST; DESIGN; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1080/0305215X.2017.1307355
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The goal of robust optimization methods is to obtain a solution that is both optimum and relatively insensitive to uncertainty factors. Most existing robust optimization approaches use outer-inner nested optimization structures where a large amount of computational effort is required because the robustness of each candidate solution delivered from the outer level should be evaluated in the inner level. In this article, a kriging metamodel-assisted robust optimization method based on a reverse model (K-RMRO) is first proposed, in which the nested optimization structure is reduced into a single-loop optimization structure to ease the computational burden. Ignoring the interpolation uncertainties from kriging, K-RMRO may yield non-robust optima. Hence, an improved kriging-assisted robust optimization method based on a reverse model (IK-RMRO) is presented to take the interpolation uncertainty of kriging metamodel into consideration. In IK-RMRO, an objective switching criterion is introduced to determine whether the inner level robust optimization or the kriging metamodel replacement should be used to evaluate the robustness of design alternatives. The proposed criterion is developed according to whether or not the robust status of the individual can be changed because of the interpolation uncertainties from the kriging metamodel. Numerical and engineering cases are used to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 272
页数:20
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, THESIS
[2]   Metamodel Assisted Robust Optimization under Interval Uncertainly Based on Reverse Model [J].
Cao, Longchao ;
Jiang, Ping ;
Chen, Zhimin ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Zhou, Hui .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (28) :1178-1183
[3]   Multi-linear Monte Carlo simulation method for probabilistic load flow of distribution systems with wind and photovoltaic generation systems [J].
Carpinelli, Guido ;
Caramia, Pierluigi ;
Varilone, Pietro .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 76 :283-295
[4]   A New Hybrid Algorithm for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization With Interval Uncertainty [J].
Cheng, Shuo ;
Zhou, Jianhua ;
Li, Mian .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2015, 137 (02)
[5]   Robust optimization using hybrid differential evolution and sequential quadratic programming [J].
Cheng, Shuo ;
Li, Mian .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 47 (01) :87-106
[6]   Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems [J].
Coello, CAC .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2000, 41 (02) :113-127
[7]   Sequential optimization and reliability assessment for multidisciplinary systems design [J].
Du, Xiaoping ;
Guo, Jia ;
Beeram, Harish .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 35 (02) :117-130
[8]   Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design [J].
Du, XP ;
Chen, W .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2004, 126 (02) :225-233
[9]   A feasibility robust optimization method using sensitivity region concept [J].
Gunawan, S ;
Azarm, S .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2005, 127 (05) :858-865
[10]   Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept [J].
Gunawan, S ;
Azarm, S .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 29 (01) :50-60