The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

被引:533
|
作者
Stoet, Gijsbert [1 ]
Geary, David C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Beckett Univ, Sch Social Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
cognitive ability; cross-cultural differences; educational psychology; science education; sex differences; open materials; SEX-DIFFERENCES; WOMENS UNDERREPRESENTATION; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1177/0956797617741719
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The underrepresentation of girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is a continual concern for social scientists and policymakers. Using an international database on adolescent achievement in science, mathematics, and reading (N = 472,242), we showed that girls performed similarly to or better than boys in science in two of every three countries, and in nearly all countries, more girls appeared capable of college-level STEM study than had enrolled. Paradoxically, the sex differences in the magnitude of relative academic strengths and pursuit of STEM degrees rose with increases in national gender equality. The gap between boys' science achievement and girls' reading achievement relative to their mean academic performance was near universal. These sex differences in academic strengths and attitudes toward science correlated with the STEM graduation gap. A mediation analysis suggested that life-quality pressures in less gender-equal countries promote girls' and women's engagement with STEM subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 593
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (vol 29, pg 581, 2018)
    Stoet, G.
    Geary, D. C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (01) : 110 - 111
  • [2] Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018)
    Richardson, Sarah S.
    Reiches, Meredith W.
    Bruch, Joe
    Boulicault, Marion
    Noll, Nicole E.
    Shattuck-Heidorn, Heather
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (03) : 338 - 341
  • [3] Deconstructing the Gender-Equality Paradox
    Ilmarinen, Ville-Juhani
    Lonnqvist, Jan-Erik
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 127 (01) : 217 - 237
  • [4] Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox
    Breda, Thomas
    Jouini, Elyes
    Napp, Clotilde
    Thebault, Georgia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (49) : 31063 - 31069
  • [5] A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox
    Herlitz, Agneta
    Honig, Ida
    Hedebrant, Kare
    Asperholm, Martin
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2024,
  • [6] Gender-equality issues
    Newhouse, I
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2000, 78 (24) : 10 - 10
  • [7] Gender equality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: industrial vis-a-vis academic perspective
    Antigoni Parmaxi
    Eirini Christou
    Julia Fernández Valdés
    Dalia María Puente Hevia
    Maria Perifanou
    Anastasios A. Economides
    Jelena Mazaj
    Maryna Manchenko
    Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [8] The Gender-Equality Paradox in Intraindividual Academic Strengths: A Cross-Temporal Analysis
    Balducci, Marco
    Larose, Marie-Pier
    Stoet, Gijsbert
    Geary, David C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 35 (11) : 1246 - 1259
  • [9] The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020)
    Stoet, Gijsbert
    Geary, David C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (03) : 342 - 344
  • [10] TRANSDISCIPLINARY APPROACH OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION
    Flogie, Andrej
    Abersek, Boris
    JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 14 (06): : 779 - 790