Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene Terephthalate Packaging: An Overview

被引:67
|
作者
Gomes, Thiago S. [1 ]
Visconte, Leila L. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Pacheco, Elen B. A. V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Macromol Prof Eloisa Mano, Ctr Tecnol, Ilha Fundao, Ave Horacio Macedo 2-030,Bloco J, BR-21941598 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Escola Politecn, Programa Engenharia Ambiental, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Poly(ethylene terephthalate); PET; Life cycle assessment; Recycling; Environmental impact; PET BOTTLES; POLYLACTIC ACID; DRINKING-WATER; ASSESSMENT LCA; RECYCLED-PET; PLA; IMPACT; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10924-019-01375-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a common technique to evaluate the environmental impact of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) packaging. A review is needed to gain a clear view of the accumulated knowledge, scientific trends and what remains to be done. The main purpose of this paper is to present an overview of LCA of PET, mainly for packaging. LCA studies of PET consist largely of two segments: final destination of post-consumer PET, comparing recycling with other options (incineration, landfilling); and alternative materials, comparing PET with other polymers or materials such as glass and aluminum cans. In the first case, the scenarios most often compared have been landfill disposal and mechanical recycling. There has also been considerable research on the use of post-consumer PET for energy conversion and chemical recycling. In the second case, the main polymer compared with PET is poly(lactic acid), whose mechanical properties make it unsuitable for carbonated beverage bottles. Numerous articles have focused only on energy consumption or global warming potential. Few studies have discussed mechanical recycling technologies in LCA and there is a lack of data on the processes used in developing countries. This review highlights the need to conduct LCA studies of PET, since many aspects are still not fully understood.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 548
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of pharmaceutical packaging
    Fabiana Bassani
    Carla Rodrigues
    Pedro Marques
    Fausto Freire
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 978 - 992
  • [22] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BEVERAGE PACKAGING
    Brock, Alice
    Williams, Ian D.
    DETRITUS, 2020, 13 : 47 - 61
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of pharmaceutical packaging
    Bassani, Fabiana
    Rodrigues, Carla
    Marques, Pedro
    Freire, Fausto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (07): : 978 - 992
  • [24] Potential of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in a circular economy from a life cycle assessment perspective - a case study for anaesthesia and surgical instrument packaging waste in Australia
    Keul, Constantin
    Spierling, Sebastian
    Venkatachalam, Venkateshwaran
    Endres, Hans-Josef
    Barner, Leonie
    Wyssusek, Kerstin
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [25] Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in the packaging industry
    Nistico, Roberto
    POLYMER TESTING, 2020, 90
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of two packaging materials for carbonated beverages (polyethylene terephthalate vs. glass): Case study for the lebanese context and importance of the end-of-life scenarios
    Boutros, Marleine
    Saba, Sabine
    Manneh, Rima
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 314
  • [27] Overview of life cycle assessment activities
    Abhaysingh Chavan
    Vinod K. Sharma
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 (3) : 179 - 179
  • [28] Life cycle assessment - introduction and overview
    Russell, A
    Ekvall, T
    Baumann, H
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (13-14) : 1207 - 1210
  • [29] ON THE USEFULNESS OF LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PACKAGING
    HEIJUNGS, R
    GUINEE, JB
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 19 (05) : 665 - 668
  • [30] Environmental life cycle assessment in microelectronics packaging
    Andrae, ASG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (03): : 215 - 216