Self-Presentation in Selection Settings: the Case of Personality Tests

被引:10
作者
Marcus, Bernd [1 ]
Goldenberg, Judy [2 ]
Fine, Saul [2 ]
Hummert, Henning [1 ]
Traum, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Inst Business Adm, Ulmenstr 69, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
[2] Israel Def Forces, Dept Behav Sci, Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
Personnel selection; Self-presentation; Faking; Personality assessment; PERSONNEL-SELECTION; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; FAKING; JOB; APPLICANT; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; INTELLIGENCE; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-019-09642-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on theoretical views that applicants express meaningful skills and motivation when presenting themselves in personnel selection settings, we challenge conventional wisdom that self-presentation necessarily impairs the diagnostic value of "fakable" selection devices. Instead, we propose to supplement the traditional psychometric approach to personnel selection with a social perspective that leverages the competitive nature of selection. In order to capture an outcome of self-presentation, we introduce the Ideal Employee Coefficient (IEC) as a supplement to traditional scoring of responses to personality items. Construct and criterion-related validity evidence using the IEC was collected in two studies covering three samples from diverse settings, populations, and measures. The IEC consistently showed incremental criterion-related validity beyond the same tests' traditional scores, as well as construct-related evidence in line with theoretical underpinnings. Findings imply that traditional personality constructs can be meaningfully aggregated with measures of self-presentation that are cost-effectively derived from the same data sources.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 571
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits [J].
Ackerman, PL ;
Heggestad, ED .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (02) :219-245
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PRINC VAL US PERS SE
[3]  
Bakan D., 1966, DUALITY HUMAN EXISTE
[4]   Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Mount, MK ;
Judge, TA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 9 (1-2) :9-30
[5]   A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures [J].
Birkeland, Scott A. ;
Manson, Todd M. ;
Kisamore, Jennifer L. ;
Brannick, Michael T. ;
Smith, Mark A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 14 (04) :317-335
[6]   Methods of Measuring Faking Behavior [J].
Burns, Gary N. ;
Christiansen, Neil D. .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2011, 24 (04) :358-372
[7]   Situational judgment and job performance [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2002, 15 (03) :233-254
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, V2
[9]   A Meta-Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales [J].
Connelly, Brian S. ;
Chang, Luye .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2016, 84 (03) :319-334
[10]   The Effects of Empirical Keying of Personality Measures on Faking and Criterion-Related Validity [J].
Cucina, Jeffrey M. ;
Vasilopoulos, Nicholas L. ;
Su, Chihwei ;
Busciglio, Henry H. ;
Cozma, Irina ;
DeCostanza, Arwen H. ;
Martin, Nicholas R. ;
Shaw, Megan N. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) :337-356