Off-farm role in stabilizing disposable farm income: A Lithuanian case study

被引:7
作者
Dabkien, Vida [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Inst Agrarian Econ, Dept Market Res Agr Prod, Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA | 2020年 / 66卷 / 07期
关键词
Farm Accountancy Data Network; farm income indicators; income volatility; net earnings; poverty threshold; SUSTAINABILITY; AGRICULTURE; LEVEL; DIVERSIFICATION; SIZE;
D O I
10.17221/69/2020-AGRICECON
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The paper aims to investigate family farm income volatility by decomposing disposable farm income (DFI) into the on-farm income, income from production support and off-farm income (OFI) over time. The research is focused on the OFI, assessing its role in achieving DFI above reference level based on the average net earnings. Three main indicators consistent with Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) were indicated. The research results revealed the significance of OFI. In 2017, 76% of the family farms were engaged in off-farm activities indicating, on one hand that such approaches as part-time farming or lifestyle farming are becoming more attractive to Lithuanian family farmers. On the other hand, research disclosed that farms mostly engaged in off-farm activities yield the lowest on-farm income levels. Moreover, the OFI tends to produce a stabilizing effect on quite a number of farmers as the majority of family farms cannot rely upon the on-farm income as their only income source. Thus, the agricultural and rural development policy makers, aimed at supporting viable farm income and strengthening farm resilience, have to answer the part-time farmers' needs.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 334
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agritourism and off-farm work: survival strategies for small farms
    Khanal, Aditya R.
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 45 : 65 - 76
  • [22] Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus
    Giannakis, Elias
    Efstratoglou, Sophia
    Antoniades, Artemis
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [23] How Off-farm Employment Affects Technical Efficiency of China's Farms: The Case of Jiangsu
    Zhang, Linxiu
    Su, Weiliang
    Eriksson, Tor
    Liu, Chengfang
    CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2016, 24 (03) : 37 - 51
  • [24] Off-Farm Work, Intensity of Government Payments, and Farm Exits: Evidence from a National Survey in the United States
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    Fannin, J. Mathew
    Joo, Hyunjeong
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2014, 62 (02): : 283 - 306
  • [25] Off-farm work, technical efficiency, and rice production risk in Taiwan
    Chang, Hung-Hao
    Wen, Fang-I
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 42 (02) : 269 - 278
  • [26] Determinants of Off-Farm Income among Smallholder Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana: Application of a Double-Hurdle Model
    Anang, Benjamin Tetteh
    Yeboah, Richard W. N.
    ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 2019
  • [27] Off-farm work, adoption of resource-conservation technology, and farm performance: evidence from banana farmers in China
    Huang, Enlin
    Zhu, Yueji
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [28] Spillovers from off-farm self-employment opportunities in rural Niger
    Dedehouanou, Senakpon Fidele Ange
    Araar, Abdelkrim
    Ousseini, Aichatou
    Harouna, Abdoulaziz Laouali
    Jabir, Maimounata
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 105 : 428 - 442
  • [29] How Gender Dynamics Shape Off-farm Work in Upland Southwest China☆
    Zinda, John Aloysius
    Anshumali, Amit
    RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 87 (04) : 1244 - 1273
  • [30] Migration, local off-farm employment, and agricultural production efficiency: evidence from China
    Yang, Jin
    Wang, Hui
    Jin, Songqing
    Chen, Kevin
    Riedinger, Jeffrey
    Peng, Chao
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2016, 45 (03) : 247 - 259