Development and assessment of novel machine learning models to predict medication non-adherence risks in type 2 diabetics

被引:11
作者
Li, Mengting [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Xiangyu [2 ,3 ]
Yang, HengBo [4 ]
Yuan, Rong [2 ,5 ]
Yang, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Rongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xingwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Pharm, Personalized Drug Therapy Key Lab Sichuan Prov, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Sichuan Translat Med Res Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg 2, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Chengdu Med Coll, Sch Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Endocrine Dept, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
medication adherence; T2D; machine learning; prediction model; ensemble model; DRUG-THERAPY; ADHERENCE; ADULTS; METAANALYSIS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000622
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundMedication adherence is the main determinant of effective management of type 2 diabetes, yet there is no gold standard method available to screen patients with high-risk non-adherence. Developing machine learning models to predict high-risk non-adherence in patients with T2D could optimize management. MethodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out on patients with T2D at the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from April 2018 to December 2019 who were examined for HbA1c on the day of the survey. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the questionnaire and electronic medical records. The sample was randomly divided into a training dataset and a test dataset with a radio of 8:2 after data preprocessing. Four imputing methods, five sampling methods, three screening methods, and 18 machine learning algorithms were used to groom data and develop and validate models. Bootstrapping was performed to generate the validation set for external validation and univariate analysis. Models were compared on the basis of predictive performance metrics. Finally, we validated the sample size on the best model. ResultsThis study included 980 patients with T2D, of whom 184 (18.8%) were defined as medication non-adherence. The results indicated that the model used modified random forest as the imputation method, random under sampler as the sampling method, Boruta as the feature screening method and the ensemble algorithms and had the best performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score, and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of the best model, among a total of 1,080 trained models, were 0.8369, 0.7912, and 0.9574, respectively. Age, present fasting blood glucose (FBG) values, present HbA1c values, present random blood glucose (RBG) values, and body mass index (BMI) were the most significant contributors associated with risks of medication adherence. ConclusionWe found that machine learning methods could be used to predict the risk of non-adherence in patients with T2D. The proposed model was well performed to identify patients with T2D with non-adherence and could help improve individualized T2D management.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aditama Lisa, 2020, J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, V30, DOI 10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0257
[3]  
Arredondo Armando, 2013, Am J Public Health, V103, pe1, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301106
[4]   Determining hypertensive patients' beliefs towards medication and associations with medication adherence using machine learning methods [J].
Aziz, Firdaus ;
Malek, Sorayya ;
Ali, Adliah Mhd ;
Wong, Mee Sieng ;
Mosleh, Mogeeb ;
Milow, Pozi .
PEERJ, 2020, 8
[5]   Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Azulay, Revital ;
Valinsky, Liora ;
Hershkowitz, Fabienne ;
Magnezi, Racheli .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2019, 7 (02)
[6]   Global Economic Burden of Diabetes in Adults: Projections From 2015 to 2030 [J].
Bommer, Christian ;
Sagalova, Vera ;
Heesemann, Esther ;
Manne-Goehler, Jennifer ;
Atun, Rifat ;
Baernighausen, Till ;
Davies, Justine ;
Vollmer, Sebastian .
DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 (05) :963-970
[7]   Wide Clinic-Level Variation in Adherence to Oral Diabetes Medications in the VA [J].
Bryson, Chris L. ;
Au, David H. ;
Maciejewski, Matthew L. ;
Piette, John D. ;
Fihn, Stephan D. ;
Jackson, George L. ;
Perkins, Mark ;
Wong, Edwin S. ;
Yano, Elizabeth M. ;
Liu, Chuan-Fen .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (05) :698-705
[8]   Homology modeling using parametric alignment ensemble generation with consensus and energy-based model selection [J].
Chivian, Dylan ;
Baker, David .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2006, 34 (17)
[9]   Design of protein switches based on an ensemble model of allostery [J].
Choi, Jay H. ;
Laurent, Abigail H. ;
Hilser, Vincent J. ;
Ostermeier, Marc .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
[10]   Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences [J].
Chowdhury, Rajiv ;
Khan, Hassan ;
Heydon, Emma ;
Shroufi, Amir ;
Fahimi, Saman ;
Moore, Carmel ;
Stricker, Bruno ;
Mendis, Shanthi ;
Hofman, Albert ;
Mant, Jonathan ;
Franco, Oscar H. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (38) :2940-2948