Correlation of Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio to Laboratory International Normalized Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients Taking Warfarin

被引:20
作者
Hoel, Robert W. [1 ,6 ]
Albright, Robert C. [2 ,6 ]
Beyer, Lisa K. [3 ]
Santrach, Paula J. [3 ,6 ]
Magtibay, Donna L. [5 ]
Everson, Stephanie L. [5 ]
McBane, Robert D. [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Pharm Serv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Nephrol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med Pathol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Nursing, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2009年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
ANTICOAGULATION;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.03360708
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: To determine whether point-of-care (POC) International Normalized Ratio (INR) test results correlate with plasma INR measures in intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) patients on warfarin. Anemia is thought to reduce the accuracy of POC INR assay results. Whether POC INR testing could be implemented for hemodialysis patients on chronic warfarin, who are often anemic despite hematopoietic therapy, has not been established. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-seven chronic hemodialysis patients on warfarin contributed sets of three consecutive blood samples for INR comparison immediately before hemodialysis: one finger stick, two from hemodialysis access (arteriovenous graft, fistula, or catheter). POC INR testing was performed using CoaguChek S device. Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 32%. Results: Pairwise comparison and correlation of 258 INR results showed high correlation for POC versus laboratory INR (r 0.94; P < 0.001). Of these, 16 (6%) differed by >0.6 INR units, four (1.6%) differed by >0.8 INR units, and one differed by >1.0 INR units. Resulting pairwise correlation analyses between samples were: for anemic patients (0.96; P < 0.001), nonanemic patients (0.93; P < 0.001), and for those obtained from arteriovenous grafts (0.94; P < 0.001). POC INR samples from dialysis catheters correlated poorly with laboratory INR results. Conclusions: POC INR correlates well with plasma INR measures in IHD patients requiring chronic warfarin, and anemia did. not influence this reliability. Blood sampling from finger stick or arteriovenous graft or fistula showed excellent correlation with laboratory INR, whereas sampling from dialysis catheters was unsatisfactory, likely from heparin contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
Chaudhry Rajeev, 2004, Manag Care Interface, V17, P44
[3]   Safety of anticoagulation therapy in well-informed older patients [J].
Kagansky, N ;
Knobler, H ;
Rimon, E ;
Ozer, Z ;
Levy, S .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 164 (18) :2044-2050
[4]   Importance of device evaluation for point-of-care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs [J].
McBane, RD ;
Felty, CL ;
Hartgers, ML ;
Chaudhry, R ;
Beyer, LK ;
Santrach, PJ .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 80 (02) :181-186
[5]   Point of care testing for INR monitoring: where are we now? [J].
Murray, ET ;
Fitzmaurice, DA ;
McCahon, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2004, 127 (04) :373-378
[6]  
Roche Diagnostics, 2004, TECHN INF COAGUCHEK
[7]   Differences in warfarin dosing decisions based on international normalized ratio measurements with two point-of-care testing devices and a reference laboratory measurement [J].
Shermock, KM ;
Bragg, L ;
Connor, JT ;
Fink, J ;
Mazzoli, G ;
Kottke-Marchant, K .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (11) :1397-1404
[8]   Clinical impact of point-of-care vs laboratory measurement of anticoagulation [J].
Sunderji, R ;
Gin, K ;
Shalansky, K ;
Carter, C ;
Chambers, K ;
Davies, C ;
Schwartz, L ;
Fung, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 123 (02) :184-188