Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure)

被引:49
作者
Pancholy, Samir B. [1 ]
Joshi, Pankaj [2 ]
Shah, Sanjay [3 ]
Rao, Sunil V. [4 ]
Bertrand, Olivier F. [5 ]
Patel, Tejas M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Commonwealth Med Coll, Wright Ctr Grad Med Educ, Scranton, PA USA
[2] Seth NHL Municipal Med Coll, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[3] Apex Heart Inst, Dept Intervent Cardiol, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[4] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Laval, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Apex Heart Inst, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
coronary angiography; operator experience; radiation exposure; transradial access; LEARNING-CURVE; TRANSFEMORAL APPROACH; TRANSRADIAL APPROACH; FEMORAL ACCESS; ARTERY ACCESS; INTERVENTION; OPERATOR; EXPERIENCE; CATHETERIZATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to perform a randomized noninferiority trial of radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization comparing femoral access (FA) with left radial access (LRA) and right radial access (RRA). BACKGROUND Increased radiation exposure with radial approach compared with femoral approach remains a controversial issue. METHODS This study randomized 1,493 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at a tertiary care center to FA, LRA, and RRA in a 1:1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint was air kerma. The secondary endpoints included dose-area product, fluoroscopy time and operator dose per procedure, number of cineangiograms, and number of catheters. RESULTS Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar among groups. No significant differences were observed in air kerma (medians: FA: 421 mGy [interquartile range (IQR): 337 to 574 mGy], LRA: 454 mGy [IQR: 331 to 643 mGy], and RRA: 483 mGy [IQR: 382 to 592 mGy], p = 0.146), dose-area product (medians: FA: 25.5 Gy cm(2) [IQR: 19.6 to 34.5 Gy cm(2)], LRA: 26.6 Gy cm(2) [IQR: 19.5 to 37.5 Gy cm(2)], and RRA: 27.7 Gy cm(2) [IQR: 21.9 to 34.4 Gy cm(2)], p = 0.40), or fluoroscopy time (medians: FA: 1.3 min [IQR: 1.0 to 1.7 min], LRA: 1.3 min [IQR: 1.0 to 1.7 min], and RRA: 1.32 min [IQR: 1.0 to 1.7 min], p = 0.19) among the 3 access sites. Median operator exposure was higher in the LRA group (3 mrem [IQR: 2 to 5 mrem], p = 0.001 vs. FA, and p = 0.0001 vs. RRA) compared with the FA (2 mrem [IQR: 2 to 4 mrem] and RRA groups (3 mrem [IQR: 2 to 5 mrem]). CONCLUSIONS Radiation exposure to patients was similar during diagnostic coronary angiography with FA, RRA, and LRA. However, LRA was associated with significantly higher operator radiation exposure than were FA and RRA procedures. (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure [REVERE]; NCT01677481) (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1196
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Low Rate Fluoroscopy at Reducing Operator and Patient Radiation Dose During Transradial Coronary Angiography and Interventions
    Abdelaal, Eltigani
    Plourde, Guillaume
    MacHaalany, Jimmy
    Arsenault, Jean
    Rimac, Goran
    Dery, Jean-Pierre
    Barbeau, Gerald
    Larose, Eric
    De larochelliere, Robert
    Nguyen, Can M.
    Allende, Ricardo
    Ribeiro, Henrique
    Costerousse, Olivier
    Mongrain, Rosaire
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (05) : 567 - 574
  • [2] Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients Above 75 Years of Age
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Ropers, Dieter
    Kallert, Lisa
    Turan, Nesrin
    Kraehner, Robert
    Wolf, Tobias
    Garlichs, Christoph
    Flachskampf, Frank
    Daniel, Werner G.
    Ludwig, Josef
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 72 (05) : 629 - 635
  • [3] Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Agostoni, P
    Biondi-Zoccai, GGL
    De Benedictis, ML
    Rigattieri, S
    Turri, M
    Anselmi, M
    Vassanelli, C
    Zardini, P
    Louvard, Y
    Hamon, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) : 349 - 356
  • [4] Characterization of Operator Learning Curve for Transradial Coronary Interventions
    Ball, Warren T.
    Sharieff, Waseem
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Hong, Tony
    Kutryk, Michael J. B.
    Graham, John J.
    Fam, Neil P.
    Chisholm, Robert J.
    Cheema, Asim N.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (04) : 336 - 341
  • [5] Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    Belisle, Patrick
    Joyal, Dominique
    Costerousse, Olivier
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Meerkin, David
    Joseph, Lawrence
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 163 (04) : 632 - 648
  • [6] Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bisch, Laurence
    Da Costa, Antoine
    Dauphinot, Virginie
    Romeyer-Bouchard, Cecile
    Khris, Lila
    M'Baye, Alassane
    Isaaz, Karl
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2010, 12 (08): : 1141 - 1148
  • [7] A Randomized Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty
    Brueck, Martin
    Bandorski, Dirk
    Kramer, Wilfried
    Wieczorek, Marcus
    Hoeltgen, Reinhard
    Tillmanns, Harald
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (11) : 1047 - 1054
  • [8] Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison
    Cooper, CJ
    El-Shiekh, RA
    Cohen, DJ
    Blaesing, L
    Burket, MW
    Basu, A
    Moore, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1999, 138 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [9] Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers
    Doig, GS
    Simpson, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 20 (02) : 187 - 191
  • [10] Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access
    Geijer, H
    Persliden, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (09) : 1674 - 1680