Discrepancy of simulating snap-off processes in 2D and 3D pore-throats

被引：9
作者：
He, Long [1 ]
Han, Siming [1 ]
Yuan, Yuejin [1 ]
Yuan, Yueding [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Xian 710021, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Math & Stat, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
来源：
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS | 2022年 / 653卷
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Snap-off; 3D pore-throat; Droplet; Capillary pressure; 2-PHASE FLOW; NONWETTING FLUID; FOAM-GENERATION; POROUS-MEDIA; OIL DROPLETS; VOLUME; DYNAMICS; NANOPARTICLES; MECHANISMS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129978
中图分类号：
O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];
学科分类号：
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
3D pore-throats with uniform thickness were commonly used to explore snap-off processes in experimental studies, and always simplified as 2D areal models in simulation of snap-off processes. However, 3D effects of capillary force, viscous force and wall cannot be neglected. We assume that snap-off processes in 2D and 3D porethroats may exist discrepancy. Snap-off processes in both 2D and 3D pore-throats were simulated with various capillary numbers Ca, viscosity ratios mu r and size ratios M of throat and pore. The results showed: (1) snap-off was more prone to occur with the same M in 3D pore-throats due to the larger capillary pressure difference; (2) the increase of M inhibited occurrence of snap-off, and the inhibition effect of M was more obvious in 2D porethroats; (3) snap-off only occurred with M < 7/35 in 2D pore-throats, which was significant different from the Roof theory (M < 1/2). These findings indicate that 2D areal models are not suitable to simplify the 3D porethroat in simulating snap-off processes.
引用
收藏
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Polaron Plasma in Equilibrium with Bright Excitons in 2D and 3D Hybrid Perovskites [J].
Simbula, Angelica ;
Pau, Riccardo ;
Wang, Qingqian ;
Liu, Fang ;
Sarritzu, Valerio ;
Lai, Stefano ;
Lodde, Matteo ;
Mattana, Francesco ;
Mula, Guido ;
Geddo Lehmann, Alessandra ;
Spanopoulos, Ioannis D. ;
Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. ;
Marongiu, Daniela ;
Quochi, Francesco ;
Saba, Michele ;
Mura, Andrea ;
Bongiovanni, Giovanni .
ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS, 2021, 9 (16)
[42]   Reconstruction of 3D Microstructures from 2D Images via Transfer Learning [J].
Bostanabad, Ramin .
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2020, 128
[43]   Inferring statistical properties of 3D cell geometry from 2D slices [J].
Sharp, Tristan A. ;
Merkel, Matthias ;
Manning, M. Lisa ;
Liu, Andrea J. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02)
[44]   2D periodic structures patterned on 3D surfaces by interference lithography for SERS [J].
Lettrichova, Ivana ;
Laurencikova, Agata ;
Pudis, Dusan ;
Novak, Jozef ;
Goraus, Matej ;
Kovac, Jaroslav, Jr. ;
Gaso, Peter ;
Nevrela, Juraj .
APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2018, 461 :171-174
[45]   Study of development changes in kidneys of dogs by using 2D and 3D ultrasonography [J].
Dinesh ;
Behl, S. M. ;
Singh, Prem ;
Tayal, Rishi ;
Pal, Madan ;
Chandolia, R. K. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (01) :30-34
[46]   Comparison of 2D and 3D dynamic image analysis for characterization of natural sands [J].
Li, Linzhu ;
Iskander, Magued .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2021, 290
[47]   Fluidized beds modeling: Validation of 2D and 3D simulations against experiments [J].
Shi, Hongbo ;
Komrakova, Alexandra ;
Nikrityuk, Petr .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 343 :479-494
[48]   Constructing of 3D Fluvial Reservoir Model Based on 2D Training Images [J].
Li, Yu ;
Li, Shaohua ;
Zhang, Bo .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (13)
[49]   FOLFIRINOX Pharmacodynamic Interactions in 2D and 3D Pancreatic Cancer Cell Cultures [J].
Allen-Coyle, Taylor J. ;
Niu, Jin ;
Welsch, Eva ;
Conlon, Neil T. ;
Garner, Weylon ;
Clynes, Martin ;
O'Sullivan, Finbarr ;
Straubinger, Robert M. ;
Mager, Donald E. ;
Roche, Sandra .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2022, 24 (06)
[50]   GPU accelerated Monte Carlo simulation of the 2D and 3D Ising model [J].
Preis, Tobias ;
Virnau, Peter ;
Paul, Wolfgang ;
Schneider, Johannes J. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2009, 228 (12) :4468-4477
12345