Sensory irritation of acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, peroxyacetic acid and their mixture in mice

被引:50
作者
Gagnaire, F [1 ]
Marignac, B [1 ]
Hecht, G [1 ]
Héry, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Natl Rech & Secur, Dept Pollutants & Hlth, F-54501 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
关键词
peroxyacetic acid; hydrogen peroxide; sensory irritation; mice;
D O I
10.1093/annhyg/mef005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The expiratory bradypnoea indicative of upper airway irritation in mice was evaluated during a period of 60 min of oronasal exposure to acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid vapours. The airborne concentration resulting in a 50 % decrease in the respiratory rate of mice (RD50) was calculated for each chemical. The concentration-response curves of acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid had similar slopes. The results did however show that the three chemicals had different irritant potencies. The RD50 values of acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid were 227, 113 and 5.4 p.p.m. respectively. Moreover, a mixture containing 53 % acetic acid, 11 % hydrogen peroxide and 36 % peroxyacetic acid had an RD50 of 10.6 ppm, 3.8 ppm being peroxyacetic acid, which is 1.4 times lower than the theoretical value estimated from the fractional concentrations and the respective RD(50)s of the individual components. On the basis of a TLV-STEL (threshold limit value for short-term exposure limit) equal to 0.1 RD50 the TLV-STELs for acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid should not exceed 20, 10 and 0.5 p.p.m. respectively. On the basis of a TLV-TWA (time-weighted average) equal to 0.03 RD50, the TLV-TWAs for these same chemicals should not exceed 5, 3 and 0.2 p.p.m. respectively. Finally, these values and existing TLVs in Europe and the USA are compared.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alarie Y, 1996, SAR QSAR Environ Res, V5, P151, DOI 10.1080/10629369608032986
[3]   BIOASSAY FOR EVALUATING THE POTENCY OF AIRBORNE SENSORY IRRITANTS AND PREDICTING ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF EXPOSURE IN MAN [J].
ALARIE, Y .
FOOD AND COSMETICS TOXICOLOGY, 1981, 19 (05) :623-626
[4]   SPOROCIDAL PROPERTIES OF PERACETIC-ACID AND HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE, ALONE AND IN COMBINATION, IN COMPARISON WITH CHLORINE AND FORMALDEHYDE FOR ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE DISINFECTION [J].
ALASRI, A ;
VALVERDE, M ;
ROQUES, C ;
MICHEL, G ;
CABASSUD, C ;
APTEL, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 39 (01) :52-60
[5]  
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2011, ASTM C496/C496M-11
[6]   THE BACTERICIDAL, FUNGICIDAL AND SPORICIDAL PROPERTIES OF HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE AND PERACETIC-ACID [J].
BALDRY, MGC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1983, 54 (03) :417-423
[7]  
BLOCK SS, 1992, KIRK OTHMER ENCY CHE, V8, P237
[8]   SENSORY IRRITATION CAUSED BY VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL AIRBORNE CHEMICALS [J].
DECEAURRIZ, JC ;
MICILLINO, JC ;
BONNET, P ;
GUENIER, JP .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1981, 9 (02) :137-143
[9]  
Dychdala G. R., 1988, P 4 C PROGRESSES CHE, P315
[10]  
*ECETOC, 2001, 40 ECETOC, P1