Evaluating Methane Production from Anaerobic Mono- and Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste, Corn Stover, and Chicken Manure

被引:187
作者
Li, Yeqing [1 ]
Zhang, Ruihong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiaoying [1 ]
Chen, Chang [1 ,3 ]
Xiao, Xiao [1 ]
Feng, Lu [1 ]
He, Yanfeng [1 ]
Liu, Guangqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Biomass Energy & Environm Engn Res Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SOLID-STATE; SODIUM-HYDROXIDE; CROP RESIDUES; SWINE MANURE; FOOD WASTE; PRETREATMENT; RATIO; BIODEGRADABILITY; FEEDSTOCKS;
D O I
10.1021/ef400117f
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW), corn stover (CS), and chicken manure (CM) under mesophilic (37 degrees C) conditions were conducted in batch mode with the aim of investigating the biomethane potential (BMP), biodegradability, methane production performance, and stability of the process. An initial volatile solid concentration of 3 g VS L-1 with a substrate-to-inoculum (S/I) ratio of 0.5 was first tested, and two S/I ratios of 1.5 and 3.0 were evaluated subsequently. The modified Gompertz equation was used to assist in the interpretation of the conclusions. The results showed that BMP and specific methane yields were 725 and 683 mL g(-1) VSadded for KW, 470 and 214 mL g(-1) VSadded for CS, and 617 and 291 mL g(-1) VSadded for CM, respectively. Therefore, KW had the highest biodegradability of 94% as compared with CS (45%) or CM (47%). For KW mono- and co-digestion with CS, CM, or their mixture, methane production performance was better at an S/I ratio of 1.5 than that of 3.0. For CS, CM, and their mixture, S/I ratios of both 1.5 and 3.0 were suitable. A synergistic effect was found in the co-digestion process, which was mainly attributed to a proper carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and the reduced total volatile fatty acids-to-total alkalinity ratio, thus providing better buffering capacity and supporting more microorganisms for efficient digestion.
引用
收藏
页码:2085 / 2091
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays [J].
Angelidaki, I. ;
Alves, M. ;
Bolzonella, D. ;
Borzacconi, L. ;
Campos, J. L. ;
Guwy, A. J. ;
Kalyuzhnyi, S. ;
Jenicek, P. ;
van Lier, J. B. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) :927-934
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[3]   MECHANISM OF METHANE FERMENTATION [J].
BUSWELL, AM ;
MUELLER, HF .
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1952, 44 (03) :550-552
[4]   Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure [J].
Callaghan, FJ ;
Wase, DAJ ;
Thayanithy, K ;
Forster, CF .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (01) :71-77
[5]   BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL OF BIOMASS AND WASTE FEEDSTOCKS [J].
CHYNOWETH, DP ;
TURICK, CE ;
OWENS, JM ;
JERGER, DE ;
PECK, MW .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1993, 5 (01) :95-111
[6]   Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste [J].
El-Mashad, Hamed M. ;
Zhang, Ruihong .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (11) :4021-4028
[7]   Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks [J].
Gunaseelan, VN .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2004, 26 (04) :389-399
[8]   EFFECT OF INOCULUM SUBSTRATE RATIO ON METHANE YIELD AND PRODUCTION-RATE FROM STRAW [J].
HASHIMOTO, AG .
BIOLOGICAL WASTES, 1989, 28 (04) :247-255
[9]   DETERMINATION OF PROTEIN CONTENT OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTING SLUDGE [J].
HATTINGH, WH ;
THIEL, PG ;
SIEBERT, ML .
WATER RESEARCH, 1967, 1 (03) :185-&
[10]   Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production [J].
He, Yanfeng ;
Pang, Yunzhi ;
Liu, Yanping ;
Li, Xiujin ;
Wang, Kuisheng .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2008, 22 (04) :2775-2781