A Multidimensional Analysis of Electricity Generation Options with Different Scenarios in Turkey

被引:13
作者
Boran, F. E. [1 ]
Dizdar, E. [2 ]
Toktas, I. [3 ]
Boran, K. [4 ]
Eldem, C. [5 ]
Asal, O. [6 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Karabuk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Karabuk, Turkey
[3] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Engn & Nat Sci Fac, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Gazi Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
[5] Gazi Univ, Tech Educ Fac, Dept Mech Educ, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
[6] Gazi Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Fac Technol, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
electricity generation; modified TOPSIS Method; multi criteria decision making; GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY UTILIZATION; WIND ENERGY; POWER-PLANT; CONSUMPTION; HYDROPOWER; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/15567240903117591
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Due to global warming, environmental concerns play an important role in the generation and use of energy, especially electricity, compared with other forms of energy, not only for developing countries but also the world. Turkey is one of the developing countries and the demand of electricity has increased in the last few years and is expected to continue in the future. The main energy sources for electricity generation are based on fossil fuels, lignite, hard coal, and hydro. Lignite- and hard coal-based power plants have been commonly used in Turkey. Although these power plants provide an efficient way for generating electricity with low cost, emissions of green house gases, especially carbon monoxide gas are very high. In this study, a multidimensional analysis of electricity generation options with different scenarios in Turkey is accomplished by using a modified technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method. Efficiency, installation cost, electricity cost and emission of the carbon dioxide gas criteria, which are commonly used in evaluation of electricity generation options, are taken into consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 55
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Determination of the wind energy potential for Maden-Elazig, Turkey [J].
Akpinar, EK ;
Akpinar, S .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (18-19) :2901-2914
[2]   Current geothermal energy potential in Turkey and use of geothermal energy [J].
Balat, Mustafa .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2006, 1 (01) :55-65
[3]   Energy production, consumption, and environmental pollution for sustainable development: A case study in Turkey [J].
Bilen, K. ;
Ozyurt, O. ;
Bakirci, K. ;
Karsli, S. ;
Erdogan, S. ;
Yimaz, M. ;
Comakli, O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2008, 12 (06) :1529-1561
[4]   A Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making to Evaluate Energy Policy Based on an Information Axiom: A Case Study in Turkey [J].
Boran, F. E. ;
Boran, K. ;
Dizdar, E. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2012, 7 (03) :230-240
[5]   Evaluation of Natural Gas Systems: A Comparison Study for Turkey [J].
Boran, F. E. ;
Boran, K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2012, 7 (03) :222-229
[6]   The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation in Turkey Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Boran, F. E. ;
Boran, K. ;
Menlik, T. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2012, 7 (01) :81-90
[7]   Multi-criteria Axiomatic Design Approach to Evaluate Sites for Grid-connected Photovoltaic Power Plants: A Case Study in Turkey [J].
Boran, F. E. ;
Menlik, T. ;
Boran, K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2010, 5 (03) :290-300
[8]   Performance evaluation of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli, Turkey [J].
Cerci, Y .
ENERGY, 2003, 28 (01) :27-35
[9]   Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers [J].
Cheng, CH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1999, 107 (01) :25-35
[10]   Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights [J].
Deng, H ;
Yeh, CH ;
Willis, RJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :963-973