Connecting the dots: a closer look at the linkage between EU implementation experiences and EU policy change

被引:3
作者
Polman, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Van Eerd, Marjolein [3 ]
Zwaan, Pieter [4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Polit Sci, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Publ Adm & Policy Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Geog Planning & Environm Dept, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Pub Adm Dept, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Policy process; Implementation; Feedback; Policy change; MULTIPLE STREAMS; EUROPEAN-UNION; UNITED-STATES; COMMISSION; GOVERNANCE; INSTITUTIONS; EQUILIBRIUM; AMBIGUITY; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/07036337.2020.1814757
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
EU policy studies typically treat implementation and policy formulation as distinct stages. As a result, we lack a systematic understanding of the impact of implementation experiences on EU policy change. Insights on the feedback of implementation experiences to the EU level, however, are important to further the debate about the resilience, responsiveness and problem-solving capacities of the EU. The aim of this article is develop a research agenda which facilitates more systematic studies on the impact of implementation experiences on EU policy change. Based on a review of EU implementation and policy change studies, various theories of the policy process and an analysis of the EU policy setting, several expectations and research questions are formulated about which factors explain when implementation experiences are mobilized, gain access to the policy process, are used by policymakers at the EU level and what effects this may have on policy change.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 224
页数:18
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy [J].
Ackrill, Robert ;
Kay, Adrian ;
Zahariadis, Nikolaos .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 20 (06) :871-887
[2]   Multiple streams in EU policy-making: the case of the 2005 sugar reform [J].
Ackrill, Robert ;
Kay, Adrian .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 18 (01) :72-89
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Learning in Public Policy: Analysis, Modes and Outcomes
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J EUR INTEGR, DOI DOI 10.1080/07036330902782196
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Jenkins-Smith and Sabatier, P5
[6]  
Argyris C., 1996, ORG LEARNING
[7]   Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies [J].
Barrett, SM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2004, 82 (02) :249-262
[8]  
Baumgartner Frank., 1993, Agendas and Instability in American Politics
[9]   Ideas, institutions, and policy change [J].
Beland, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 16 (05) :701-718
[10]   THE LESSONS OF LEARNING - RECONCILING THEORIES OF POLICY LEARNING AND POLICY CHANGE [J].
BENNETT, CJ ;
HOWLETT, M .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1992, 25 (03) :275-294