Economic viability of packaging waste recycling systems: A comparison between Belgium and Portugal

被引:49
作者
Marques, Rui Cunha [4 ]
da Cruz, Nuno Ferreira [1 ]
Simoes, Pedro [1 ]
Ferreira, Sandra Faria [1 ]
Pereira, Marta Cabral [1 ]
De Jaeger, Simon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Management Studies CEG IST, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Hgsk Univ Brussel HUBrussel, Fac Econ & Management, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven KULeuven, Fac Business & Econ, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, DECivil, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Belgium; Extended producer responsibility; Green dot; Packaging waste; Portugal; Recycling; SOLID-WASTE; PRIVATIZATION; PERFORMANCE; COLLECTION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive has had an undeniable impact on waste management throughout the European Union. Whereas recycling and recovery targets are the same, member states still enjoy a considerable degree of freedom with respect to the practical organization and management strategies adopted. Nevertheless, in all cases, the industry (which brings packaging material onto the market) should be responsible for the costs associated with packaging waste recycling/recovery (following the extended producer responsibility principle). The current paper compares and contrasts the institutional frameworks and financial costs and benefits of waste management operators for Belgium and Portugal. The unit costs of selective collection and sorting of packaging waste are provided for both countries. In Belgium, the costs of recycling seem to be fully supported by the industry (through Fost Plus, the national Green Dot agency). In Portugal the fairness of the recycling system depends on the perspective adopted (economic or strictly financial). Adopting a strictly financial perspective, it seems that Sociedade Ponto Verde (SPV, the Portuguese Green Dot agency) should increase the transfers to local authorities. However, the conclusions differ for this country if the avoided costs with refuse collection and other treatment are taken into account. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 33
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Adams M., 2011, STAK EV OCT 25 EUR C
[3]   European environmental taxes and charges: economic theory and policy practice [J].
Bailey, I .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 22 (03) :235-251
[4]   Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Warner, Mildred .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 52 (12) :1337-1348
[5]   Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Fageda, Xavier .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2009, 139 (1-2) :105-119
[6]  
Belgian G., 2012, BELGIAN GAZETTE, V182, P12943
[7]  
Belgian G., 2012, BELGIAN GAZETTE, V182, P45872
[8]  
Belgian G., 2012, BELGIAN GAZETTE, V182, P30502
[9]   The costs of municipal waste and recycling programs [J].
Bohm, Robert A. ;
Folz, David H. ;
Kinnaman, Thomas C. ;
Podolsky, Michael J. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (11) :864-871
[10]   Economies of size and density in municipal solid waste recycling in Portugal [J].
Carvalho, Pedro ;
Marques, Rui Cunha .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (01) :12-20