Deterrence of financial misreporting when public and private enforcement strategically interact
被引:26
作者:
Schantl, Stefan F.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Melbourne, Fac Business & Econ, 198 Berkeley St, Carlton, Vic 3053, AustraliaUniv Melbourne, Fac Business & Econ, 198 Berkeley St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
Schantl, Stefan F.
[1
]
Wagenhofer, Alfred
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Fac Business Econ & Social Sci, Univ Str 15, A-8010 Graz, AustriaUniv Melbourne, Fac Business & Econ, 198 Berkeley St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
Wagenhofer, Alfred
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Business & Econ, 198 Berkeley St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Fac Business Econ & Social Sci, Univ Str 15, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Accounting manipulation;
Deterrence;
Public enforcement;
Investor litigation;
Litigation risk;
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM;
CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS;
SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION;
CAREER CONCERNS;
VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE;
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS;
MERITS MATTER;
PART I;
DIRECTORS;
RESTATEMENTS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101311
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
This paper studies strategic interactions between public and private enforcement of accounting regulation and their consequences for the deterrence of financial misreporting. We develop an economic model with a manager, a public enforcement agency, and an investor and derive equilibrium strategies for manipulative effort, routine investigative effort, and costly private litigation. Our main results are as follows. (i) Strengthening private enforcement unambiguously enhances deterrence, whereas strengthening public enforcement can exacerbate misreporting, due to a crowding out of private enforcement. We provide conditions under which (ii) the enforcer's investigation incentives first increase and then decrease in the strength of private enforcement, (iii) public and private enforcement are strategic substitutes, (iv) the number of enforcement actions is misleading about public enforcement effectiveness, and (v) strengthening private enforcement decreases litigation risk. We also discuss implications of our results for empirical research. Crown Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.