In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography

被引:92
作者
Benic, Goran I. [1 ]
Sancho-Puchades, Manuel [1 ]
Jung, Ronald E. [1 ]
Deyhle, Hans [2 ]
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Biomat Sci Ctr, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
artifact; cone beam computed tomography; dental implant; in vitro; radiology; titanium; CBCT DEVICES; ACCURACY; CT; DIMENSIONS; REDUCTION; BONE; DOSIMETRY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12048
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the geometric pattern and the intensity of artifacts around titanium implants in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model. Material and methods Ten test models, each containing one 4.1-mm-diameter titanium implant, were cast from a human mandible using silicone impression material and dental stone. Each model contained an implant in one of the following single-tooth gaps: 37, 36, 34, 33, 31, 41, 43, 44, 46, and 47. For control purposes, three models without implants were produced. Each model was scanned five times using a CBCT scanner. Gray values (GV) were recorded at eight circumferential positions around the implants at 0.5mm, 1mm, and 2mm from the implant surface (GVTest). GV were measured in the corresponding volumes of interest (VOI) in the models without implants (GVControl). Differences of gray values (GV) between GVTest and GVControl were calculated as percentages. To detect differences between GVTest and GVControl, the 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed for the values of GV. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for the comparison of GV at 0.5mm, 1mm, and 2mm from the implant surface. Results Artifacts reflected by altered GV were always present in the proximity of titanium implants, regardless of the implant position. When comparing GVTest and GVControl, increased GV were found at the buccal and lingual aspects of the implant sites, whereas regions with reduced GV were located along the long axis of the mandibular body of the test models. A significant decrease in artifact intensity was found with increasing distance from the buccal implant surface (GV0.5mm: 45 +/- 10% [SD], GV1mm: 28 +/- 14% [SD], GV2mm: 14 +/- 7% [SD]) (P<0.001). Conclusion Artifacts around titanium implants in CBCT images were distributed according to a geometrical pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 383
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions [J].
Al-Ekrish, A. A. ;
Ekram, M. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (02) :67-75
[2]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[3]   Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system [J].
Bryant, J. A. ;
Drage, N. A. ;
Richmond, S. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (07) :365-374
[4]   Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review [J].
Chiapasco, Matteo ;
Zaniboni, Marco .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :113-123
[5]   Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard [J].
Corpas, Livia dos Santos ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde ;
Quirynen, Marc ;
Huang, Yan ;
Naert, Ignace ;
Duyck, Joke .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (05) :492-499
[6]   Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom® cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT [J].
Draenert, F. G. ;
Coppenrath, E. ;
Herzog, P. ;
Muller, S. ;
Mueller-Lisse, U. G. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (04) :198-203
[7]  
Fatemitabar SA, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V25, P499
[8]   E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of Diagnostic Imaging in Implant Dentistry - A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. [J].
Harris, D ;
Buser, D ;
Dula, K ;
Gröndahl, K ;
Harris, D ;
Jacobs, R ;
Lekholm, U ;
Nakielny, R ;
van Steenberghe, D ;
van der Stelt, P .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (05) :566-570
[9]   REDUCTION OF CT ARTIFACTS CAUSED BY METALLIC IMPLANTS [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
HEBEL, R ;
EBERSBERGER, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) :576-577
[10]   Tissue augmentation and esthetics (Working Group 3) [J].
Klinge, B. ;
Flemmig, Thomas F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :166-170