Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting

被引:66
作者
Biais, Matthieu [1 ,2 ]
Carrie, Cedric [1 ]
Delaunay, Francois [1 ]
Morel, Nicolas [1 ]
Revel, Philippe [1 ]
Janvier, Gerard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Bordeaux, Hop Pellegrin, Emergency Dept, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Bordeaux Segalen, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2012年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
HAND-HELD ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; ULTRASOUND; AGREEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; VALIDATION; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1186/cc11340
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: In the emergency setting, focused cardiac ultrasound has become a fundamental tool for diagnostic, initial emergency treatment and triage decisions. A new ultra-miniaturized pocket ultrasound device (PUD) may be suited to this specific setting. Therefore, we aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of an ultra-miniaturized ultrasound device (Vscan (TM), GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI) and of a conventional high-quality echocardiography system (Vivid S5 (TM), GE Healthcare) for a cardiac focused ultrasonography in patients admitted to the emergency department. Methods: During 4 months, patients admitted to our emergency department and requiring transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were included in this single-center, prospective and observational study. Patients underwent TTE using a PUD and a conventional echocardiography system. Each examination was performed independently by a physician experienced in echocardiography, unaware of the results found by the alternative device. During the focused cardiac echocardiography, the following parameters were assessed: global cardiac systolic function, identification of ventricular enlargement or hypertrophy, assessment for pericardial effusion and estimation of the size and the respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. Results: One hundred fifty-one (151) patients were analyzed. With the tested PUD, the image quality was sufficient to perform focused cardiac ultrasonography in all patients. Examination using PUD adequately qualified with a very good agreement global left ventricular systolic dysfunction (k = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76-0.97), severe right ventricular dilation (k = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.71-1.00), inferior vena cava dilation (k = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.80-1.00), respiratory-induced variations in inferior vena cava size in spontaneous breathing (k = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98), pericardial effusion (k = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.55-0.95) and compressive pericardial effusion (k = 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.00). Conclusions: In an emergency setting, this new ultraportable echoscope (PUD) was reliable for the real-time detection of focused cardiac abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American College of Emergency Physicians, 2009, Ann Emerg Med, V53, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.013
[2]   Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using an ultrasonic stethoscope in critically ill patients [J].
Amiel, Jean-Bernard ;
Gruemann, Ana ;
Lheritier, Gwenaelle ;
Clavel, Marc ;
Francois, Bruno ;
Pichon, Nicolas ;
Dugard, Anthony ;
Marin, Benoit ;
Vignon, Philippe .
CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (01)
[3]   Utility and diagnostic accuracy of hand-carried ultrasound for emergency room evaluation of chest pain [J].
Atar, S ;
Feldman, A ;
Darawshe, A ;
Siegel, RJ ;
Rosenfeld, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03) :408-409
[4]   Bedside echocardiography in the assessment of the critically ill [J].
Beaulieu, Yanick .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (05) :S235-S249
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   Usefulness of a New Miniaturized Echocardiographic System in Outpatient Cardiology Consultations as an Extension of Physical Examination [J].
Cardim, Nuno ;
Fernandez Golfin, Covadonga ;
Ferreira, Daniel ;
Aubele, Adalia ;
Toste, Julia ;
Angel Cobos, Miguel ;
Carmelo, Vanda ;
Nunes, Igor ;
Oliveira, Antonio Gouveia ;
Zamorano, Jose .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (02) :117-124
[7]   International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography [J].
Cholley, B. P. ;
Mayo, P.H. ;
Poelaert, J. ;
Vieillard-Baron, A. ;
Vignon, P. ;
Alhamid, S. ;
Balik, M. ;
Beaulieu, Y. ;
Breitkreutz, R. ;
Canivet, J.-L. ;
Doelken, P. ;
Flaatten, H. ;
Frankel, H. ;
Haney, M. ;
Hilton, A. ;
Maury, E. ;
McDermid, R.C. ;
McLean, A.S. ;
Mendes, C. ;
Pinsky, M.R. ;
Price, S. ;
Schmidlin, D. ;
Slama, M. ;
Talmor, D. ;
Teles, J. M. ;
Via, G. ;
Voga, G. ;
Wouters, P. ;
Yamamoto, T. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (07) :1077-1083
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]   The pocket echocardiograph: a useful new tool? [J].
Egan, Margaret ;
Ionescu, A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2008, 9 (06) :721-725
[10]   Is it time for the sonoscope? If so, then let's do it right! [J].
Filly, RA .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (04) :323-325