Common Themes in Teaching Reading for Understanding: Lessons From Three Projects

被引:38
作者
Goldman, Susan R. [1 ,2 ]
Snow, Catherine [3 ]
Vaughn, Sharon [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Liberal Arts & Sci, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Learning Sci Res Inst, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[3] Harvard Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Educ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Univ Texas Austin, Meadows Ctr Preventing Educ Risk, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
SOCIAL-STUDIES KNOWLEDGE; MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS; DISCIPLINARY LITERACY; LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY; ACADEMIC-LANGUAGE; COMPREHENSION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/jaal.586
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instructional practices that successfully support adolescents in reading for understanding include purposeful engagement with text, social support, and new content learning that leverages prior knowledge. This article reflects a metaview of the work of the three research projects funded through the Institute for Education Sciences under the Reading for Understanding competition that addressed middle-grade through high school readers (grades 4-12). All three projects shared the assumption that instruction is necessary for successful reading to learn just as it is for learning to read. Through multiple studies conducted independently, the three projects arrived at common themes and features of productive instruction for reading for understanding with adolescent readers. These common themes are elaborated with instructional examples and include the following: (a) Students purposefully engage with multiple forms of texts and actively process them, (b) instructional routines incorporate social support for reading through a variety of participation structures, and (c) instruction supports new content learning by leveraging prior knowledge and emphasizing key constructs and vocabulary.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 264
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], READING WRITING Q
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, STAGES READING DEV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PEOPLE LEARN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TIM ACT AG ADV AD LI
[5]   PHYSICISTS READING PHYSICS - SCHEMA-LADEN PURPOSES AND PURPOSE-LADEN SCHEMA [J].
BAZERMAN, C .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 1985, 2 (01) :3-23
[6]  
Blumenfeld P.C., 1992, ADV RETEACHING, V3, P81
[7]  
DOYLE W, 1983, REV EDUC RES, V53, P159, DOI 10.2307/1170383
[8]   Toward Disciplinary Literacy: Dilemmas and Challenges in Designing History Curriculum to Support Middle School Students [J].
Duhaylongsod, Leslie ;
Snow, Catherine E. ;
Selman, Robert L. ;
Donovan, M. Suzanne .
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2015, 85 (04) :587-608
[9]  
Goldman S., 2015, The Oxford handbook of reading, P463, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199324576.013.25
[10]  
Goldman S. R., 2016, S ANN M AM ED RES AS