The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A Systematic Review

被引:7
作者
Thu Doan Ngoc Vuong [1 ]
Loi Tan Nguyen [1 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Int Univ, Becamex Sch Business, Binh Duong New City 75114, Binh Duong, Vietnam
关键词
performance appraisal; employee; appraisal indicators; performance measurement; JOB-SATISFACTION; MANAGEMENT; APPRAISAL; MOTIVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; LEADERSHIP; FRAMEWORK; BUSINESS; FEEDBACK; CULTURE;
D O I
10.3390/su142114017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Businesses must maintain their ability to adapt in order to remain competitive in today's ever-evolving industry. They must collect and evaluate data continuously to make educated decisions and take appropriate measures. As a result, since the turn of the 20th century, managers' preferred areas of interest have been connected to the achievement of their companies. This systematic review aimed to assess the most important methodologies for measuring employee performance in organizations. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) technique, the researchers carried out a systematic review on a specific topic. A thorough review of the literature was carried out, with a particular emphasis on articles, research papers, and other materials deemed relevant to the primary approaches for staff performance measurement and their associated factors and other relevant resources. The systematic review findings revealed that collaboration initiatives had positive and statistically significant standard-size effects on employee performance. The use of performance measurement attempts to identify the strengths and weaknesses of employees and to motivate them to improve their performance. Employee performance measurement demonstrates a favorable relationship between performance evaluation and employee inspiration. Performance evaluation schemes should be designed to provide a good treatment perspective of other teammates and the worker's own aims.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 82 条
[71]  
Swan W.S., 2010, READY TO USE PERFORM
[72]   THE IMPACT OF PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE SCHEMES ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AUSTRALIAN AND MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES [J].
Taylor, Jeannette ;
Beh, LooSee .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 15 (08) :1090-1115
[73]   Exploring performance management in four UK trade unions [J].
Thursfield, Denise ;
Grayley, Katy .
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, 2016, 38 (05) :789-804
[74]   Targets as a tool in health policy Part I: lessons learned [J].
van Herten, LM ;
Gunning-Schepers, LJ .
HEALTH POLICY, 2000, 53 (01) :1-11
[75]   Business process performance measurement: a structured literature review of indicators, measures and metrics [J].
Van Looy, Amy ;
Shafagatova, Aygun .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
[76]   Motivating social sharing of e-business content: Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, or crowding-out effect? [J].
Vilnai-Yavetz, Iris ;
Levina, Olga .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 79 :181-191
[77]  
Walters J., 2010, Positive Management: Increasing Employee Productivity
[78]  
Waniewski P., 2017, ZESZ TEOR RACHUN, V93, P211, DOI [10.5604/01.3001.0010.3197, DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0010.3197]
[79]  
Warokka A, 2012, J HUM RESOUR MANAG R, V1, P2012
[80]   Subjective adjustments to objective performance measures: The influence of prior performance [J].
Woods, Alexander .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2012, 37 (06) :403-425