Delirium risk prediction models for intensive care unit patients: A systematic review

被引:18
作者
Chen, Junshan [1 ]
Yu, Jintian [1 ]
Zhang, Aiqin [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Affiliated Med Sch, Jinling Hosp, Dept Intens Care Unit, 305 Zhongshan East Rd, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Affiliated Med Sch, Jinling Hosp, Dept Profess Training Clin Nursing, 305 Zhongshan East Rd, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Delirium; Prediction model; ICU; Systematic review; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM; PRECIPITATING FACTORS; PREVENTION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102880
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically review the delirium risk prediction models for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid and Web of Science were searched to collect studies on delirium risk prediction models for ICU patients from database establishment to 31 March 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies using the CHARMS (CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies) checklist. A descriptive analysis was used to describe and summarise the data. Results: A total of six models were included. All studies reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the prediction models in the derivation and (or) validation datasets as over 0.7 (from 0.75 to 0.9). Five models reported calibration metrics. Decreased cognitive reserve and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score were the most commonly reported predisposing and precipitating factors, respectively, of ICU delirium among all models. The small sample size, lack of external validation and the absence of or unreported blinding method increased the risk of bias. Conclusion: According to the discrimination and calibration statistics reported in the original studies, six prediction models may have moderate power in predicting ICU delirium. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias in the included studies. More clinical studies should be carried out to validate whether these tools have satisfactory predictive performance in delirium risk prediction for ICU patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-5
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V3rd ed.
[4]  
Banerjee Abhijit V., 2010, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics
[5]  
Baron R., 2015, GMS German Medical Science, V13, pDoc19
[6]   Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Barr, Juliana ;
Fraser, Gilles L. ;
Puntillo, Kathleen ;
Ely, E. Wesley ;
Gelinas, Celine ;
Dasta, Joseph F. ;
Davidson, Judy E. ;
Devlin, John W. ;
Kress, John P. ;
Davidson, Judy E. ;
Devlin, John W. ;
Kress, John P. ;
Joffe, Aaron M. ;
Coursin, Douglas B. ;
Herr, Daniel L. ;
Tung, Avery ;
Robinson, Bryce R. H. ;
Fontaine, Dorrie K. ;
Ramsay, Michael A. ;
Riker, Richard R. ;
Sessler, Curtis N. ;
Pun, Brenda ;
Skrobik, Yoanna ;
Jaeschke, Roman .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (01) :263-306
[7]  
Bogovic Tajana Zah, 2012, Acta Medica Croatica, V66, P61
[8]   Neurological complications in renal failure: a review [J].
Brouns, R ;
De Deyn, PP .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 107 (01) :1-16
[9]   Preventing Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Brummel, Nathan E. ;
Girard, Timothy D. .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2013, 29 (01) :51-+
[10]   Delirium in adult cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Bush, S. H. ;
Lawlor, P. G. ;
Ryan, K. ;
Centeno, C. ;
Lucchesi, M. ;
Kanji, S. ;
Siddiqi, N. ;
Morandi, A. ;
Davis, D. H. J. ;
Laurent, M. ;
Schofield, N. ;
Barallat, E. ;
Ripamonti, C. I. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 :143-165