Effect Decomposition in the Presence of an Exposure-Induced Mediator-Outcome Confounder

被引:285
作者
VanderWeele, Tyler J. [1 ,2 ]
Vansteelandt, Stijn [3 ]
Robins, James M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math Comp Sci & Stat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MODELS;
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0000000000000034
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Methods from causal mediation analysis have generalized the traditional approach to direct and indirect effects in the epidemiologic and social science literature by allowing for interaction and nonlinearities. However, the methods from the causal inference literature have themselves been subject to a major limitation, in that the so-called natural direct and indirect effects that are used are not identified from data whenever there is a mediator-outcome confounder that is also affected by the exposure. In this article, we describe three alternative approaches to effect decomposition that give quantities that can be interpreted as direct and indirect effects and that can be identified from data even in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder. We describe a simple weighting-based estimation method for each of these three approaches, illustrated with data from perinatal epidemiology. The methods described here can shed insight into pathways and questions of mediation even when an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder is present.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CAUSALITY PSYCHOPATH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CAUSALITY MODELS REA
[3]  
[Anonymous], EPIDEMIOL B IN PRESS
[4]  
Avin C., 2005, P 19 INT JOINT C ART, P357
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]  
Didelez V., 2006, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, P138
[7]   Identifying direct and indirect effects in a non-counterfactual framework [J].
Geneletti, Sara .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2007, 69 :199-215
[8]   Estimation of controlled direct effects [J].
Goetgeluk, Sylvie ;
Vansteelandt, Stijn ;
Goetghebeur, Els .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2008, 70 :1049-1066
[9]   Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments [J].
Imai, Kosuke ;
Yamamoto, Teppei .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 21 (02) :141-171
[10]   A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis [J].
Imai, Kosuke ;
Keele, Luke ;
Tingley, Dustin .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 15 (04) :309-334