Technologies, infrastructures and migrations: material citizenship politics

被引:28
作者
Amelung, Nina [1 ]
Gianolla, Cristiano [2 ]
Solovova, Olga [3 ]
Ribeiro, Joana Sousa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Commun & Soc Res Ctr CECS, Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Social Studies, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Oslo, Ctr Multilingualism Soc Lifespan Multiling, Oslo, Norway
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Science and technology studies; sociomaterial and epistemic practices; material politics of citizenship; acts of citizenship; autonomy of migration technologies; BORDER; PROTEST; AUTONOMY; CAMPS; ACTS;
D O I
10.1080/13621025.2020.1784636
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article aims to explore the multiple uses and consequences of different technologies and infrastructures in the context of migrations and how such uses and consequences inhabit and transform migrants' rights and subjectivities. It reviews relevant literature at the intersection of citizenship, critical migration studies and science and technology studies (STS), focusing in particular on the current debates underway within critical citizenship studies that examine how technologies and infrastructures shape the ability to acts of citizenship. By mobilizing insights from STS, we focus on how these political subjectivities are shaped by certain sociomaterial and epistemic practices. By introducing the notion of material citizenship politics, the article outlines a way to differentiate three different constitutive forms between technologies, infrastructures and citizenship in migrations. Technologies and infrastructures can (1)constrainacts of citizenship in migration and border regimes; (2) constitutecontestation and participationover citizenship; or (3)enable and shape alternativeacts of citizenship in migration and border regimes. As it provides a theoretical background to the special issue, the article also serves as the introduction to the issue.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 606
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
[11]  
De Sousa Santos B., 2014, Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315634876
[12]  
Santos BD, 2011, UTOP PRAX LATINOAM, V16, P17
[13]  
Dewey J., 1990, MIDDLE WORKS J DEWEY, V13, P337
[14]  
Dijstelbloem H, 2011, MIGRAT MINOR CITIZEN, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230299382
[15]   Border surveillance, mobility management and the shaping of non-publics in Europe [J].
Dijstelbloem, Huub ;
Broeders, Dennis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2015, 18 (01) :21-38
[16]   Ecology of Sites of Confinement: Everyday Life in a Detention Center for Illegalized Non-citizens [J].
Esposito, Francesca ;
Ornelas, Jose ;
Briozzo, Erica ;
Arcidiacono, Caterina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 63 (1-2) :190-207
[17]  
Foucault M., 1973, BIRTH CLIN ARCHAEOLO
[18]  
Freeman Richard., 2016, Knowing Governance. The epistemic construction of political order, P1, DOI DOI 10.1057/9781137514509
[19]   A material politics of citizenship: the potential of circulating materials from UK Immigration Removal Centres [J].
Hughes, Sarah M. ;
Forman, Peter .
CITIZENSHIP STUDIES, 2017, 21 (06) :675-692
[20]  
Isin EF., 2002, HDB CITIZENSHIP STUD, DOI [10.4135/9781848608276, DOI 10.4135/9781848608276]