Legal institutions and informal networks

被引:14
作者
de Mesquita, EB
Stephenson, M
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
informal economy; informal networks; legal institutions; social norms; transaction costs;
D O I
10.1177/0951629806059595
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The relationship between third-party contract enforcement and informal networks raises important sociological, political, and economic questions. When economic activity is embedded in social structures, what are the implications of third-party contract enforcement for the scope and nature of economic relations? What determines whether individuals rely on formal legal institutions or informal networks to sustain trade relationships? Do legal institutions erode informal networks? We develop a model in which a trade-off exists between size and sustainability of networks. By adding the possibility of fee-based, enforceable contracts, we provide a theoretical explanation for the coexistence of legal contract enforcement and an informal economy. We find that legal enforcement has little effect on networks until law becomes sufficiently inexpensive, at which point small decreases in the cost of law have dramatic effects on network size and the frequency of use of the legal system.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 67
页数:28
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB EC SOCIOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Moore, Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach
[3]  
Arnold B. C., 1998, A First Course in Order Statistics
[4]  
Benson B. L., 1990, The Enterprise of Law: Justice without the State
[6]  
COLSON E, 1974, TRADITION CONTRACT
[8]  
Cooter Robert, 1984, Int'l Rev. L. Econ, V4, P15
[9]  
De Soto H., 1989, OTHER PATH INVISIBLE
[10]   Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks? [J].
DiMaggio, P ;
Louch, H .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 63 (05) :619-637